Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Screeeech, Aug 7, 2018.
Well things are picking up for him.
It's nice that The Independent report the facts even if their headline is misleading, unlike The Guardian.
The Guardian headline :
The actual story as reported by The Independent :
So someone has sent child abuse images in the meta data of an email to InfoWars, which has then forwarded them on to the lawyers of the Sandy Hook victims as requested by a judge, and now it's being reported that Alex Jones has sent child abuse images to the Sandy Hook victims. What quality reporting by The Guardian.
I'm disgusted, but not entirely surprised to learn that Jones has child porn on his server. Sending them to grieving parents is pretty low.
Literally nothing you've written here is factual. The server belongs to InfoWars which employs 20+ people, Alex Jones probably has nothing to do with the day to day emails they get sent, the email was forwarded to the victims lawyers because it was requested by a judge - not the actual victims. The email originally was one someone else forwarded to InfoWars and the abuse images was encoded in the metadata of the email. Don't let facts get in the way of your disgust though
How do you encode images in email metadata?
Posted 14 minutes later -
Someone needs to read before posting a confirmed conspiracy theory, that's a ban-able offence!!!
Could just be a URL or something, doesn't say, The Independent is reporting that though.
This guy explains it well
Says the emails had been sent to info wars and we're unopened, I assume info wars just clicked all their emails and sent them to the lawyers.
They have hundreds of thousands of emails. Looks like someone was trying to stitch him up.
It's easy to see why they'd try to stitch him up when people are willing to lap a fake news headline without even doing any basic research.
I wonder if Jones will try the old 'someone else put it there' gag.
'I was hacked guv, honest!'
Still not reading the story and spreading a disproved conspiracy theory instead, hope you don't have a YT channel!!!
The emails were SENT to him, how is that not hard to understand?
I can't stand Alex Jones, think he's a massive degenerate and one of the most obvious grifters of all time... pretty much certain he's not a nonce though. There are so many legitimate things you can criticise him for, this seemingly isn't one of them unless new evidence comes to light.
Can't feel too bad for him though given he happily accuses others of pedophilia without any evidence to back it up.
Gosh, I wonder who that sounds like
He so mad, look at that incoherent ranting.
Email metadata definitions;
1. Data stored in an email about the email. Often this data is not even viewable in email client application used to create the email. The amount of email metadata available for a particular email varies greatly depending on the email system. Contrast with file system metadata and document metadata.
2. Data stored in an email about the email. Often this data is not even viewable in email client application used to create the email. The amount of email metadata available for a particular email varies greatly depending on the email system. Example: Subject, Sent Date, To, Attachment, etc.
The fact is anyone could fall victim to that as any spam could be sent and you don't even have to view it if you use an email client.
But I was told I was a crazy conspiracy theorist for thinking elite child sex trafficking rings exist
You are when you claim pizza is a codeword paedos use.
Lie detector tests are absolutely rubbish.
Separate names with a comma.