Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,306
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Great to see my views haven't changed and my guitar collection is still safe.
Today I learned that aliens are popping to asda for the weekly shop.
Update 2023: decided to bump this thread and share my insights after 17 years, see page 9, post ~168:
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...lained-on-google-video.17665231/post-36296448
Aliens and UFOs explained on Google Video **Updated - 20:30 16/12/06 +new video**
*snip*
"In all seriousness" I cant actually work out if you are joking or notIn all seriousness, that's less ridiculous than most of the "it's aliens" stuff. Even though you've taken one of ritcH's unsupported claims (that people from other worlds often "simply go shopping for the day" on Earth) and made it a bit sillier, it's still less ridiculous than most of the "it's aliens" stuff. If (and it's a very big if) there are alien civilisations with routine interstellar travel at effective speeds vastly in excess of the "speed of light"(*) and they know about us and they come here at least quite often (i.e. the usual "it's aliens" assumptions) then it would be plausible that there would be a market for "genuine Earth products". Sure, they could make exact copies of Mars bars or Asda's own brand baked beans or whatever, but those wouldn't be "genuine".
* phrased that way because it's not really about light per se. The naming irritates me.
"In all seriousness" I cant actually work out if you are joking or not
What bothers you about phrasing the "speed of light" in that way?
* phrased that way because it's not really about light per se.
Aliens built the pyramids and Stonehenge because reasons
Ahh I think I get what you mean, that they wouldn't be able to travel at the speed of light or greater?I'm not joking. I think it's wildly unlikely that it happens, but I think that it's less ridiculous than most of the "aliens did it" stuff. Aliens built the pyramids and Stonehenge because reasons and they mutilated cows because reasons and they made the Nasca lines as landing strips for spaceships (which wouldn't need landing strips and the Nazca lines wouldn't be suitable as landing strips for anything anyway). Etc, etc. I explained why I think that in my post, the one you quoted, although pretty much anything would be less ridiculous than most of the "it's aliens" claims.
it's a universal constant, not specific to light. Which doesn't necessarily travel at that speed.
Ahh I think I get what you mean, that they wouldn't be able to travel at the speed of light or greater?
Wow ok, you went way too deep off a joke I made in response to the nonsense ritcH posted. I'm not sure how you got the impression I have tried to interpret your post in any way, the only part I asked you about was how you were phrasing the speed of light in a certain way.I'm at a bit of a loss here. I thought I was being clear in my meaning to begin with and then again in the second post clarifying the first. But you've interpreted it as something completely different. I don't even know which part of my post you're responding to when you say "I think I get what you mean".
So I'll try again...
Part 1: Alien people coming to Earth at all.
My opinion: Very unlikely. Even if they do exist (we don't know anywhere near enough to even begin to assess the probability of that) and they exist today (there's been plenty of time for species to become extinct) and they have technology far in advance of ours, the distances involved weigh heavily against them even knowing we exist let alone coming here. Coming here would be far harder than detecting our existence (which would be impossible unless they happened to be extremely close on an astronomical scale). Maybe human understanding of the universe is fundamentally wrong, superluminal travel is possible, time dilation wouldn't be a problem and the fact that everything we know of fits c being a hard limit is just coincidence. But I doubt it. Perhaps there's some kind of completely functional workaround. Warp drives, wormholes, magic, whatever. But I doubt it.
Part 2: Alien people coming to Earth to do the common "aliens did it" stuff like building the pyramids, Stonehenge, etc, making the Nasca lines as landing strips for their spacecraft, mutilating cows, giving electric lamps to ancient Egyptians and so on.
My opinion: Ridiculous even if alien people were coming to Earth at that time. The only way any of it makes any kind of sense is if the aliens thought it would be funny, probably when drugged up. e.g. one night while humans were asleep, the aliens quietly used their hyper-advanced technology to build Stonehenge in a couple of hours just to freak out the local humans. I suppose something like that might possibly have happened. But I very much doubt it.
Part 3: Alien people coming to Earth to do a bit of shopping.
My opinion: If alien people are coming to Earth then doing some shopping would be less ridiculous than the usual claims because of the possibility that there might be a market back home for stuff they could buy on Earth, probably simply because it was from Earth. These hypothetical people would have to have a high enough level of curiosity about Earth and humans for any of them to bother coming here at all. So maybe genuine Earth products would have some value in their society. Or maybe just as a memento of their trip.
Since when do you believe MSM? You spent months say saying we shouldn't believe them as its all a distraction?Its on google they are REAL that is good enough evidence for me.
Fixed it for youSummary: there's still no evidence of intelligent life anywhere in the universebeyond our planet.
* phrased that way because it's not really about light per se. The naming irritates me.
I also still don't get what angilion is/was trying to say about SoL
I also haven't got a clue what you're on about.
[..] it was obvious what part of your post I was referring to so not sure why you are confused about that.
Well I thought it was obvious as that third line is the only line that mentions the speed of light so assumed you knew what I was referring to. I was genuinely interested in what you meant with regard to the speed of light phrasing.It wasn't obvious, because you quoted the whole post. Which was only three lines. So it wasn't obvious that you were only referring only to the last line and not also the other two lines you quoted.
Well I thought it was obvious as that third line is the only line that mentions the speed of light so assumed you knew what I was referring to.
I was genuinely interested in what you meant with regard to the speed of light phrasing.
Did my post ~195 clarify what I meant about the speed of light phrasing?
Its all good, i just wanted to understand wht you meant regarding the speed of light, ill have a look at post 195.Whereas I didn't assume that because you were also referring to aliens coming here so your reply could have applied to the other two lines (about aliens coming here) as well as the third line (about the common naming for the universal constant 'c'). So now the intended meaning has been clarified:
Did my post ~195 clarify what I meant about the speed of light phrasing?