• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD bag BF4

There were moments there that it seemed like I was watching a film. :cool:

I only ever play these sorts of games for the single player, but I'll certainly be getting it...eventually. :)
 
A good coup for AMD and hopefully they fully utilise the Frostbite engine. Forum talk had BF3 only using 20%-30% of the Frostbite enging and BF4 will be using 80% but forum talk can be wrong.
 
I cant get over how expensive it is to buy :S Why are we getting console pricing on a PC platform whilst console gamers are getting N64 pricing? EA are seriously price gouging this so I won't be buying it until its £30 or less AND has some reviews saying its actually good first.
 
Tazzfalcon said:
I'm guessing a single card setup is going to struggle with this on high settings?
Click to expand...

from the video it doesn't look any different to BF3 as far as I can make out, so probably not massively increased requirements

opethdisciple said:
£44 :eek:

I know it will have a long run multiplayer wise, but thats not a price I'm comfortable with. Thats daylight robbery!
Click to expand...

it looks like a rehash of BF3 more than anything
too many other games to play at the moment so not even vaguely interested at this price
 
LtMatt said:
Oh yes you little beauty. :cool: So glad AMD bagged this one as this is one game i will rack up a hell of a lot of hours on.

EDIT

Thia is how glad i am. £55 deluxe version pre-ordered. ;)

fLLRLlY.jpg
Click to expand...

:eek::eek::eek:

It's probably going to be bundled with the 8970 that releases a few days before BF4 launch!;)

:D
 
If AMD get a tangible performance advantage over Nvidia a result of this, whilst remaining competitive on pricing, nvidia should at the very least be genuinely concerned.

As much as I hate the whole idea of BF4 right now, you just know the overwhelming majority of braindead, bunnyhopping, run-and-gunning, whole-clips-for-one-kill generation of BF3 players will be lapping it up as soon as they can. Hence, if AMD have the upper hand on performance, that's what they'll choose for their inevitable upgrade when the game gets released.

Will probably move to AMD when the 8970 comes out, but not for this garbage. Remove 3D spotting as default, heavily tone down the supression effect, add aiming/accuracy penalty for running to much (including limited stamina), remove health regen, reintegrate commander, etc etc, then I might consider BF4.
 
titaniumx3 said:
If AMD get a tangible performance advantage over Nvidia a result of this, whilst remaining competitive on pricing, nvidia should at the very least be genuinely concerned.

As much as I hate the whole idea of BF4 right now, you just know the overwhelming majority of braindead, bunnyhopping, run-and-gunning, whole-clips-for-one-kill generation of BF3 players will be lapping it up as soon as they can. Hence, if AMD have the upper hand on performance, that's what they'll choose for their inevitable upgrade when the game gets released.

Will probably move to AMD when the 8970 comes out, but not for this garbage. Remove 3D spotting as default, heavily tone down the supression effect, add aiming/accuracy penalty for running to much (including limited stamina), remove health regen, reintegrate commander, etc etc, then I might consider BF4.
Click to expand...

It's a good point. BF3 was considerably faster on equivalent nVidia hardware (for whatever reason) which inevitably affected sales a lot considering the amount of copies this game shifted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom