• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Bulldozer Finally!

Did the same, 1100T will pretty much hold its value, if you pick one up at 140 get 15 for the Deus Ex code you get a great chip for £125.

Then just wait for the next revision, which hopefully they will have started to work out some of the shortcomings!

Same here :)
I had been waiting for Bulldozer, but got the 1100T instead when I saw the test results. The Bulldozer architecture will be a winner, but not on it's first revision.
 
Why would the FX4 be popular? It's still worse than the Phenom II X4. I bet a Phenom II X3/X2 could give it a good chase in gaming.
The FX6 is crap in comparison to Intel and current AMD CPU's out at that price point too.

They simply don't have the numbers to ship.

What's worse about BD CPU's, is they seem to be limited in what the CPU NB can achieve, you can take Phenom II's to 3GHZ on the CPU-NB fairly easy, my old 1055T did 3.2GHZ for example, that'd spank the FX6 all over.

very true, old Phenom II processors get a good chunk faster in some applications with a healthy boost to the CPU-NB speeds, did that also on my 1055T and got ~17% increase in frame-rate in Starcraft II unbelievably enough!
 
Gareth, assuming you went for the FX8150, why did you not opt for the FX8120?
Both cpus clock to approximately the same level, so my understanding is that the FX8120 is where the action is at.
 
Maybe the fact the benchmarks score are so pitiful for BD, may mean that the chip is indeed decent, its just a little bit ahead of its time.

But that is not an excuse. AMD should be building chips to sell today, not working on an architecure which will be relevant in 5 years.
 
But that is not an excuse. AMD should be building chips to sell today, not working on an architecure which will be relevant in 5 years.

Indeed. Releasing a product which the masses are not ready for, can sometimes spell the end of a company.

Timing is just as important as the quality of the product itself.
 
Back
Top Bottom