Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,148
The context is what makes it a slant. It's just a dig.
Right back to the topic at hand. Had enough of this already.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The context is what makes it a slant. It's just a dig.
Nvidia brought about G-Sync for there own pockets and not for you. For all you know Nvidia knew the industry standard was coming at some point and decided to milk there customers. Either way am not really bothered. This Amd sitting letting others do there work is getting tiresome. Mantle, True Audio, and Eyefinity say other wise. Maybe it was a problem in the past but i don't think that is the case these days. AMD say they support industry standards and a more open approach which takes longer than Nvidia's in house approach no doubt. How long did it take for Nvidia to bring about surround gaming and Rroff will tell you they always had the tech to do so..
On both sides people need to be more patient as things happen really slow in the Graphic's industry. It's getting slower as well so more patience is required.
For all you know Nvidia knew the industry standard was coming at some point and decided to milk there customers.
nVidia brought G-Sync for their own pockets and not for me? That is a bit of a contradiction when I have a G-Sync monitor ordered lol And to add, at less than the price of the original 4K monitor I purchased
You do realise that Mantle isn't an 'Open Standard'? Nothing about Mantle is open. True Audio I will use of course, as that is a good addition...Oh wait! Proprietary doesn't bother me but when people are not willing to see that both are doing it, I am afraid that leaves a bitter taste.
God forbid, a company out to make money.
Then you have Freesync - only requires most users to get a new card and monitor
So, the tech has been there for years or hasn't it? AMD can't say the techs been there for years, when it's not been implemented.
It's like steam streaming, the technology has been available for absolutely years, but it's only now it's a reality. So the fact it's been around for ages is absolutely moot.
A shame Warsam isn't answering any of the genuine questions in this thread
650ti and above, it's only restriction is a native dp1.2 port on the card.
You know what i meant, if G-Sync was not going to sell cards and make money you would not have it. Mantle is in Beta and not out. Lets see where that goes before making any Judgements. Some things being Proprietary does not bother me either. G-Sync does not bother me in the slightest as there's a market for it at the moment which i think in the future will no longer be there.
Because Wasram doesn't get involved in Sid James type politics.
The 7000 series do have the tech just for Video playback... for what AMD are having changed to allow in gaming needs a new chip on the Graphics card.
Do all Nvidia GPU's support Gsync? how far back does there support go? Honest question
No I actually didn't. You made it come across that G-Sync wasn't invented for me but was only for nVidia to make money (of which again I told you that the G-Sync monitor I have ordered was cheaper than the Samsung 4K monitor I had). We are all different of course and if something new and shiny takes my fancy, I will get it if funds allow. Now as far as Freesync goes, it would be cool if Warsam or someone else from AMD (LtMatt perhaps? ) would let us know what state freesync is in and what monitors are upcoming which will be able to run freesync and what GPUs are capable of running freesync and when to expect the first freesync capable monitor or firmware upgrade.
Maybe he shouldn't have started the thread then if he has no interest in giving any info or answering questions?
@greg
Thanks, so even there back track isn't that much different to AMD.
Where in the OP did he say he will replay back here? if you read again you see
In addition, please post any questions you’d like answered here and we’ll update the FAQ accordingly. Thank you!
It would be good but Warsam is most likely only aloud to say so much. AMD seem to be good at keeping information from the press and the users. It's actually a pretty good tactic as it keeps people guessing and in doing so keeps Freesync alive in peoples minds as the guessing continues.
@greg
Thanks, so even there back track isn't that much different to AMD.
Where in the OP did he say he will replay back here? if you read again you see
In addition, please post any questions you’d like answered here and we’ll update the FAQ accordingly. Thank you!
Except it is? Quite different. Over double the cards and cards that go years back.
AMD have what, the 290/290X/295/260/265?? (Could even be less than that?)
But what AMD was pointing out is that the Freesync tech as been around for year is still true. The 7000 series and past GPU's I believe support it. Only the Newer line up support it for gaming.
So if you ignore the gaming part, AMD freesync support is right on par with Gsync support.