But would you want to?
Does that mean that one way or another you'll be blowing warm air over the second heatsink/radiator?
Yup :S
I'm re-measuring everything now to make sure, It's very likely I'll buy another cooler or case.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
But would you want to?
Does that mean that one way or another you'll be blowing warm air over the second heatsink/radiator?
A mate could have got me a furyx last week but I refused on the basis that the retailer sells jackfrags systems and I put some of the blame on that **** and his subscriber base for the downfall of battlefield.
I remember going into the "server" room at my dads work in the very early 80s with HDDs bigger than shoe boxes with 2 huge metal platters visible in each roughly record sized - held about 800KB each IIRC heh.
EDIT: Oh wow they were actually 850MB.
I seem to recall they would've cost about 40 grand each, your old man got to play with some expensive kit!
Those VRMs are pretty impressive too, capable of pushing out 400A if needed at 1.1-1.2V or more than enough to power the card. For the overclocking set the power circuitry is six phase and the water block is capable of shedding 500W if necessary. One looks at the aggregate numbers on the Fury X and the only conclusion you can come to is this card should have headroom.
Additionally with the water cooler, this insulated cover on the back and front keeps the heat from adjacent devices from bleeding onto the GPU like more open designs. Even the PCB is a matte black one, something that screams attention to detail. AMD obviously put a lot of thought, effort, and care into the physical packaging for the Fury X, once again about time.
Why no preorders yet
Why no preorders yet
No benchmarks yet either
Charlie just posted an article in semiaccurate about fiji. He warns about cleaning of thermal paste from the GPU. He is saying that it can potentially damage the chip. Have no clue how much truth there is in his words, but better safe than sorry, eh?
If true then we would have so many extreme overclockers moaning about dead GPUs after they changed the Thermal paste or cooler
Charlie dives deep on Fiji: https://semiaccurate.com/2015/06/22/amd-talks-fiji-fiji-x-odd-bits-tech/
salient points I picked up skimming just now:
- be very careful with the exposed technicolour interposer areas when re-applying paste or fitting coolers (by sounds of it some old OC guides could be dug up and be relevant again)
- remember the "400amp" thing? here's what it means
- explanation for the thickness of the cooler:
Vulkan is loosely based on the core of what was Mantle. DirectX 12 is nothing to do with either of them.
Sorry, what?. Both sides next cards will be on 16ff+ and will be a new arch so how exactly can they refine Fiji before that?
Not entirely true, Microsoft has long consulted AMD, nVidia, intel, etc. on Direct X. DirectX 12 has a certain amount of similarity with Mantle and its development was spurred by the development of Mantle. Of course, DirectX 12 goes farther than any 3rd party kit could ever manage (since it is a guarantee that it will be supported by everyone and Microsoft can change the kernel or system libraries at will).
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/1...rectx-12-will-imitate-and-destroy-amds-mantle