• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD freesync coming soon, no extra costs.... shocker

Still no information from AMD concerning whether the monitor just displays the frames when it gets them like g-sync does, or whether the graphics card is predicting a time to render the next frame and setting the monitor to wait for that amount of time before displaying the next frame, as andybird thought they would be doing. While I would be surprised if they went for the prediction method, that article doesn't really make it any clearer since "synchronising to the graphics card" could mean either of the two methods
 
Still no information from AMD concerning whether the monitor just displays the frames when it gets them like g-sync does, or whether the graphics card is predicting a time to render the next frame and setting the monitor to wait for that amount of time before displaying the next frame, as andybird thought they would be doing. While I would be surprised if they went for the prediction method, that article doesn't really make it any clearer since "synchronising to the graphics card" could mean either of the two methods

to be clear, it was techreport reporting that AMD's solution involved the GPU predicting the next frame delay
(though it is a claim that does make sense, as that is the way that variable vblank in eDP works - but it is an assumption nonetheless)
 
to be clear, it was techreport reporting that AMD's solution involved the GPU predicting the next frame delay
(though it is a claim that does make sense, as that is the way that variable vblank in eDP works - but it is an assumption nonetheless)

Just out of interest, do you have a link to the article?
 
thanks for that. it will be interesting to see if that is how freesync actually works on standalone monitors, and how good it is compared to g-sync
 
So now what? AMD is at Computex and of course is taking the opportunity to demonstrate a "FreeSync" monitor with the DisplayPort 1.2a Adaptive Sync feature at work. Though they aren't talking about what monitor it is or who the manufacturer is, the demo is up and running and functions with frame rates wavering between 40 FPS and 60 FPS - the most crucial range of frame rates that can adversely affect gaming experiences. AMD has a windmill demo running on the system, perfectly suited to showing Vsync enabled (stuttering) and Vsync disabled (tearing) issues with a constantly rotating object. It is very similar to the NVIDIA clock demo used to show off G-Sync.

View Full Size
The demo system is powered by an AMD FX-8350 processor and Radeon R9 290X graphics card. The monitor is running at 2560x1440 and is the very first working prototype of the new standard. Even more interesting, this is a pre-existing display that has had its firmware updated to support Adaptive Sync. That's potentially exciting news! Monitors COULD BE UPGRADED to support this feature, but AMD warns us: "...this does not guarantee that firmware alone can enable the feature, it does reveal that some scalar/LCD combinations are already sufficiently advanced that they can support some degree of DRR (dynamic refresh rate) and the full DPAS (DisplayPort Adaptive Sync) specification through software changes."

Full Article
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-...Monitor-DisplayPort-Adaptive-Sync-Feature#new
 
^^ thats great news Matt i hope we can flash old monitors :)

Slightly worse news
Though is that this feature isn't going to be supported on the full range of AMD Radeon graphics cards. Only the Radeon R9 290/290X and R7 260/260X (and the R9 295X2 of course) will actually be able to support the "FreeSync" technolog

I hope this can be adjusted in the future to at least include 280x's :(
 
^^ thats great news Matt i hope we can flash old monitors :)

Slightly worse news


I hope this can be adjusted in the future to at least include 280x's :(

Yeah that last part is a kicker, hopefully they can change that. Won't affect me though luckily. (on the primary rig at least)
 
I can't see many monitor vendors releasing a firmware update.
I have an Asus sonic master 2560x1080, I'd love a firmware update, but if not, hopefully when I get a 3440X1440 next year it'll have free sync, or if AMD don't release something that creates game streaming to android, a g sync monitor.
This 2560x1080 will be one of my shortest purchases lol.
 
Yes i'm not sure why it is,, maybe the connector? iI thought the tech had been on the AMD GPU's for a gen or two now

It has and as was stated before FreeSync will work on older GPU's for video playback and only on the new listed GPU's for gaming, so the artilce that said it had been in AMD GPU's for a few generations was technically correct, albeit slightly misleading.
 
I can't see many monitor vendors releasing a firmware update.
I have an Asus sonic master 2560x1080, I'd love a firmware update, but if not, hopefully when I get a 3440X1440 next year it'll have free sync, or if AMD don't release something that creates game streaming to android, a g sync monitor.
This 2560x1080 will be one of my shortest purchases lol.
I honestly don't see monitors makers would release firmware update for EOL or discontinued range...monitors that are still on the shelf might though, purely from sales and profits point of view.

If I was monitor maker, I wouldn't give reason for people to hang on to old monitors for longer than needed as well :p
 
I honestly don't see monitors makers would release firmware update for EOL or discontinued range...monitors that are still on the shelf might though, purely from sales and profits point of view.

If I was monitor maker, I wouldn't give reason for people to hang on to old monitors for longer than needed as well :p

A lot of monitors aren't even designed for end user firmware updating. Unless AMD pays a major monitor brand to implement it and headline it as a major feature forcing the others to follow suit or lose out on sales I can't see this taking off very fast.
 
Back
Top Bottom