Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
•FX-8150 FX-8150
4 Bulldozerモジュール,8MB L2,8MB L3,3.6GHz(最大4.2GHz),125W TDP,DDR3-1866 4 Bulldozer module, 8MB L2, 8MB L3, 3.6GHz (4.2GHz Max), 125W TDP, DDR3-1866
•FX-8120 FX-8120
4 Bulldozerモジュール,8MB L2,8MB L3,3.1GHz(最大4GHz),125W TDP,DDR3-1866 4 Bulldozer module, 8MB L2, 8MB L3, 3.1GHz (4GHz Max), 125W TDP, DDR3-1866
•FX-6100 FX-6100
3 Bulldozerモジュール,6MB L2,8MB L3,3.3GHz(最大3.9GHz),95W TDP,DDR3-1866 Module 3 Bulldozer, 6MB L2, 8MB L3, 3.3GHz (3.9GHz Max), 95W TDP, DDR3-1866
i'm not sure if it's fake or not. the slide as a mistake (says Zambezi is 3-1600 ). but in the article it says
it just make sense for amd to extend the life of AM3+,
i really can't see FM2 BD being released till q4 2012 or most likely q1-q2 2013
What's the BD on AM3+ being crippled stuff?
Google search only brings up this forum with a result, so I'm hoping there's some sort of conclusive report elsewhere?
amd can change the the date at any time... slides arejust a outline time schedule..What we know from the previous (genuine) AMD slide suggesting a late Q2 launch of FM2 & (10 core not 8 core) Komodo should still be taken as what will happen.).
if PCI-e 3.0 was so important it would have been on the 900 platform. because i've heard 7000 series will be out soonAlso, given that the 7xxx AMD Radeon cards will be PCI-e 3.0 compatible, according to reports, I somehow doubt it's going to take them over 12 months to launch a platform able to accommodate 3.0 (even if it's totally useless until 8xxx / 9xxx / quad-CF).
if PCI-e 3.0 was so important it would have been on the 900 platform. because i've heard 7000 series will be out soon
thats just rumours tho , we don't know for sure..Why?
The talk is BD is crippled for AM3+, but we don't know how Zambezi will perform till launch, possibly in the next 16 days (I'm doubting it will be September the 19th)
Though, I too can't see FM2 coming out Q1 or Q2 next year, that's wayyyy too short for AM3+.
Maybe AM3+ will last a while, but without Komodo, but that's just halting progression.
And I'm going to call fake on that crap.
it native supports sata 3Of course advancement is important.
What native support for SATA 3/USB 3 does 990FX give?
but amd as clearly said it wasn't maintain backwards compatability with AM3@ Wannabedammed,
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=19884891&postcount=3306
It's not just me saying it, or Zoomee etc.
Except BD works in AM3...
And you think it is pure coincidence that AMD just happened to design a complete new CPU architecture that also just happens to work on AM3 as well as AM3+?indeed it does, its supported by the board manufacturers, but not AMD themselves.
may work but maybe with performance hit or less features or not as overclockableExcept BD works in AM3...
And you think it is pure coincidence that AMD just happened to design a complete new CPU architecture that also just happens to work on AM3 as well as AM3+?
Edit: From what I can remember it was an interview with a named AMD engineer where he stated that they had to make design sacrifices to Bulldozer to ensure that AM3 was forwards compatible with AM3+.
And you think it is pure coincidence that AMD just happened to design a complete new CPU architecture that also just happens to work on AM3 as well as AM3+?
Edit: From what I can remember it was an interview with a named AMD engineer where he stated that they had to make design sacrifices to Bulldozer to ensure that AM3 was forwards compatible with AM3+.
Right I can see where you're coming from now, and that does make sense. From the get go they've hurt themselves then. Inorder to keep compatibility they've left themselves specific design routes and rules to follow. Which means they didnt have the freedom they would have at the design phase if they had designed the BD and Socket together.