So with this new x400 bios they enabling support for zen3 and dropping all older Ryzen cpus, or a least 3000 series will still be supported?
Exactly. Details here:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1580...ryzen-4000-cpus-on-b450-and-x470-motherboards
So with this new x400 bios they enabling support for zen3 and dropping all older Ryzen cpus, or a least 3000 series will still be supported?
Why was it a blanket move when the max motherboards have 32mb chips?It wasn't a financial decision but a technical one. Bios memory space is limited and were not able to offer profiles for so many varieties of CPU.
Why was it a blanket move when the max motherboards have 32mb chips?
OK. Now try and answer my questionAs detailed in the Anandtech article:
'Most AMD motherboards are outfitted with 128 megabit (16 megabyte) BIOS chips. The reason why this is the case is due to a limitation on some of AMD’s early AM4 processors – due to design, they can only ever address the first 16 megabytes of a BIOS chip.'
Because the amount of 32MB chips are far outnumbered by the 16MB chips so it's all of a question if a company wants to put resources into satisfying that minority as opposed to taking the easiest general route.Why was it a blanket move when the max motherboards have 32mb chips?
I think they saw the $$$ from making all x400 owners upgrade, and tried it on. B450 tomahawk was priced around £90, now price is double for the b550 tomahawk.....$$$Because the amount of 32MB chips are far outnumbered by the 16MB chips so it's all of a question if a company wants to put resources into satisfying that minority as opposed to taking the easiest general route.
I think that a major part of the decision was a technical one (based on what they saw as the easiest path) as it does cause headaches for both AMD and motherboard manufacturers in making older boards compatible with BIOS updates.I think they saw the $$$ from making all x400 owners upgrade, and tried it on. B450 tomahawk was priced around £90, now price is double for the b500 tomahawk.....$$$
As a resident of Utopia I can understand your view, and giving them the benefit of the doubt. Here in Hell, I'm still sure the beancounters saw the $$$ thoI think that a major part of the decision was a technical one (based on what they saw as the easiest path) as it does cause headaches for both AMD and motherboard manufacturers in making older boards compatible with BIOS updates.
Hoever, they said they would support the boards through 2020 so in the end they they needed to do the right thing in the face of justified criticism.
It will have been influenced by both factors, but there were definitely legitimate technical challenges so I am not so quick to label this one as having purely financial motives.As a resident of Utopia I can understand your view, and giving them the benefit of the doubt. Here in Hell, I'm still sure the beancounters saw the $$$ tho
I know I'm quoting myself - but in case someone else wants the same info:Anyone spotted a board yet that does gen4 x8 on two mechanical x16 slots in MATX? (that's not a million pounds!)
Ta
It's a soft release. They're released but none available yet.Thought these released already.
Yeah, every moboi has its own quirks!Got my MSI B550M Mortar today first impressions are no great with the amount of faff so far, this was replacing a Asrock B450m Pro 4 which had a dodgy onboard sound from day 1 which was getting RMA'd but was otherwise great for the money.
Issues so far:
I have 2 x M.2 drives (1 x NVME and 1 x SATA) from my previous board and the SATA m.2 drive was just not being recognised in the bios at all (1 slot accepts sata or pcei based m.2 drives and the other is pcei only). Loads of reboots and re-seats etc and it was eventually solved by flashing a newer version of the BIOS that was available on the MSI site, so all ok now just annoying and I guess the early adopter issues.
Also struggling currently getting my CPU stable with the same volatges/speed etc as I had it before, but I guess vdroop etc all behave differently across different boards so really hard to to have exactly the same settings as before, so just some trial and error needed I reckon.
Got my MSI B550M Mortar today first impressions are no great with the amount of faff so far, this was replacing a Asrock B450m Pro 4 which had a dodgy onboard sound from day 1 which was getting RMA'd but was otherwise great for the money.
Issues so far:
I have 2 x M.2 drives (1 x NVME and 1 x SATA) from my previous board and the SATA m.2 drive was just not being recognised in the bios at all (1 slot accepts sata or pcei based m.2 drives and the other is pcei only). Loads of reboots and re-seats etc and it was eventually solved by flashing a newer version of the BIOS that was available on the MSI site, so all ok now just annoying and I guess the early adopter issues.
Also struggling currently getting my CPU stable with the same volatges/speed etc as I had it before, but I guess vdroop etc all behave differently across different boards so really hard to to have exactly the same settings as before, so just some trial and error needed I reckon.
Is there any point in new "premium" B450 boards now that B550 is released?
It looks like there is a MAX version of the B450 Gaming Pro Carbon Wifi due out soonish, but is a top end B450 "better" than a mid range B550? Surely if you're in the market for a high end board like that then you'd be more interested in the B550 chipset and willing to spend a bit more on something like the B550 Tomahawk (unless you really want the onboard wifi)? Seems like MSI have dropped the ball a bit with this one, unless I'm missing something?