That's the Nvidia tax. People will always pay more for an nvidia card.Is it +20% or more better though cos that's what ur paying for?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That's the Nvidia tax. People will always pay more for an nvidia card.Is it +20% or more better though cos that's what ur paying for?
That's the Nvidia tax. People will always pay more for an nvidia card.
And that's why we have ludicrous prices in the market. There is no sensible metric which would justify the 2070 Super's price premium over the 5700 XT, but as long as Johnny "I'll Pay It Anyway" Cash Cow continues to be a moron then Nvidia will hike their prices. Which gives AMD no reason to charge sensible money, and which in turn will give Intel no reason to charge sensible money.
Personal preference, my dear willhub, is what's destroyed the pricing of the GPU market.
Is it +20% or more better though cos that's what ur paying for?
Yes it is, as not only is it faster, its also got more hardware, as its also got RT Cores on it, to do Ray Tracing, and its also got Tensor Cores, to do DLSS.
DLSS is basically dead, and I am sorry but you could put a coffee maker on it but if I don't drink coffee it doesn't add value to the card.
It is the faster card though, not by much but it is.
Yes it is, as not only is it faster, its also got more hardware, as its also got RT Cores on it, to do Ray Tracing, and its also got Tensor Cores, to do DLSS.
I drink coffee though, a lot.
Do we really need or want another Fermi 1st gen?Put the idea forward, maybe we can combine the 2 somehow. Use Furmark to warm the coffee up.
Except you don't need RT cores to do ray tracing. nVidia claim to have worked on this tech for 10 years yet non of their research papers on Ray Tracing going back 10 years mention any sort of specialized hardware only the need for more FLOPS. nVidia really loves their closed ecosystem and are willing to use hardware as the lock even when it isn't necessary. I personally am not interested in this approach when it comes to gaming market because locked ecosystems leads to higher prices and no consumer in their right mind wants this.
Do we really need or want another Fermi 1st gen?![]()
In retrospect the collaboration with George Foreman didn't pan out, so coffee could've been a better choice. Not a lot of gaming gets done when you're full of steak.If Fermi came with a built in coffee maker it would have sold even better than it did.
Personal preference, my dear willhub, is what's destroyed the pricing of the GPU market.
No they don'tThat's the Nvidia tax. People will always pay more for an nvidia card.
Exactly, they're both over-priced!They both should be no more than £300 tbh.
No they don't
When AMD/ATI had the fastest card available they were priced higher then Nvidia cards at the time (Some examples being 9800pro, x1900xt-x)
The x1900xt-x was up against the 7800GTX at the time
I can't remember now which nvidia GPU's were against the 9700pro & 9800pro at the time
As far back as I can remember which ever company had the fastest GPU available also charged the highest price
Someone correct me if am wrong
So perhaps show some restraint? Is the need to play games at 4K really so important it's worth any cost?That and the lack of choice for those of us seeking to play games @ 4K without compromising on settings. A lack of competition from AMD certainly played a part.
So perhaps show some restraint? Is the need to play games at 4K really so important it's worth any cost?