How much behind the 3080 was it in the end? Significant or decently close? Im assuming its hard to really tell because 0 idea about test conditions.
We don't know the testing conditions but the settings were listed and we can only assume it was the canned benchmarks - the only safe conclusion really was that AMD have a card which exceed Turing's performance level beyond that it is unknowns.
I think in the end people put it in the range of single digit percent behind the 3080 (also it was on development drivers so probably a touch slower than release drivers).