Soldato
In the RDNA 3 thread
This is the eventual fate of all RDNA threads as they converge towards CB2077. It happened to the RDNA2 thread after 10k replies and 430k views!
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** AMD "Navi 3X" (RDNA 3 discussion thread) ***
- Thread starter 4K8KW10
- Start date
-
- Tags
- amd radeon navi 3x rdna 3
This is the eventual fate of all RDNA threads as they converge towards CB2077. It happened to the RDNA2 thread after 10k replies and 430k views!
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,078
Hahaha yep least somebody got my humour.
AMD Navi 31 rumored to be dual 80CU chiplet design, up to 10240 cores?
AMD Navi 31 rumored to be dual 80CU chiplet design, up to 10240 cores? - VideoCardz.com
AMD Navi 31 rumored to be dual 80CU chiplet design, up to 10240 cores? - VideoCardz.com
Soldato
Guessing stock AIO cooler for the top-end dual chiplet design. Even on a smaller node, two chips like that right next to each other is going to take a serious cooling solution if they want to push its performance.
We will see how it goes but these two dies will be quite big - at least 250 mm^2 and this will effectively be another dual-GPU card like the legacy R9 295X2, HD 7990, HD 6990, etc.
They indeed could have made smaller, real 'chiplets' under 100 mm^2 and make the cards with 4, 5 and/or 6 chiplets.
Now they will still have to design smaller GPUs for the lower tiers.
They indeed could have made smaller, real 'chiplets' under 100 mm^2 and make the cards with 4, 5 and/or 6 chiplets.
Now they will still have to design smaller GPUs for the lower tiers.
Soldato
Yeah I guess this is really a trial run, only at the top-end kind of product. Then maybe Navi 4x or whatever comes after will start using more finely grained chiplets assuming the concept is proven in the wild with Navi 31.
It is not needed if the cards are fast enough as is.
DLSS is just an official enablement from Nvidia for their image quality - performance optimisation cheating. It's that just they improve it as some people say version 2 is better than version 1.
AMD doesn't need upscaling.
It has never been used in the PC games environment.
well, they are investing heavily it in according to some articles. at the moment, the rtx 3060 / ti 3070 can run games at 4k at decent framerates with dlss enabled, obviously that will hurt amd's sales of rx 6000 GPUs.
Also, Sony and Microsoft will want higher framerates on the existing consoles - a dlss equivalent is probably the only way to achieve this. could it be done without special hardware? I'm not sure
Also, Sony and Microsoft will want higher framerates on the existing consoles - a dlss equivalent is probably the only way to achieve this. could it be done without special hardware? I'm not sure
Last edited:
I can also run some games at 3840x2160 with lowered settings with my Radeon RX 560X 4GB mobile graphics card.
You can lower the settings on any card to boost the frame rate.
DLSS is just that - it lowers the settings.
And as far as it looks like - DirectX 12 doesn't support DLSS as an official standard feature - DLSS is Nvidia's proprietary setting.
Upscaling has been used on the consoles for many years - actually Nvidia stole the idea from the consoles market.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,072
The new upcoming DX upscaling tech is a MS/AMD/Nvidia collaboration that will include support for both AMD and Nvidia (tensor) hardware.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,072
Unsure as yet, but I know they've included Nvidia for wider adoption under one umbrella as it were.
Adding more GPU dies to graphics cards will likely make the availability problem worse. I think they will want to address their low rates / yields of GPU dies first.
Add to this that AMD themselves never said that RDNA 3 would utilize MCM tech.
Then, there's additional complexity in creating GPU dies with denser nodes like 5nm EUV.
it would be nice if the rx 6000 series got the dlss like tech... id be inclined to buy one if they did this.
Add to this that AMD themselves never said that RDNA 3 would utilize MCM tech.
Then, there's additional complexity in creating GPU dies with denser nodes like 5nm EUV.
it would be nice if the rx 6000 series got the dlss like tech... id be inclined to buy one if they did this.
Last edited by a moderator:
Soldato
Offs.......................................................after yet another god knows how many pages of waffle, 99% of which will be rubbish, something might be launched.
At some point in 2024 more than 300 people worldwide might be able to buy it.
What really is the point of this sort of thread ?
At some point in 2024 more than 300 people worldwide might be able to buy it.
What really is the point of this sort of thread ?
Caporegime
Its not true 4K if its DLSS.
True, but if 6/8k DLSS is 4k upscaled, it should look pretty damn good.
There is a chance the cards will be launched later this year - 2021, or at some point in Q1 2022.
Also, it is likely the global situation will improve by that time and the production will resume as per normal.
Why do you need that trolling?