Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Videos like this put me off buying this card ~_~
Videos like this put me off buying this card ~_~
I've just put a Arctic Hybrid on mine with a low noise SP Corsair fan - I don't load over 62c with no noise and the VRM temp's are about the same 62-70 on load - this is with the max overclock stable mine does on stock volts 1115 on the core and ram is at 1350 (not sure what the max oc is but I have Elpida so i'll just leave it at that).
Considering the Asus Direct CU2 loads at 77c on stock clocks which is still good I think this type of AIO watercoolers for GPU's is a must they work a lot better on GPU's than CPU's for whatever reason that may be.
Sounds like he's using a extremely aggressive fan profile as 60% sounds no where near as loud as that.
He says he's using auto fan in the 780 comparison near the end.
Afternoon gents. I really could do with some honest user opinions of this card as I'm on the verge of buying one.
I was using a GTX 780 windforce GHZ edition but due to running a Sugo SG08 case it was causing issues with dumping heat and not exhausting - a real shame as the card was probably the nicest I've owned.
I really don't want too much of a step down in terms of performance but I don't want to spend more than the 780 cost either. Realistically this leaves me with two options, the reference 780 (though I'd begrudge paying more than the "superior" aftermarket cooled versions just to get the reference cooler) and the £100 cheaper R9 290.
The one thing putting me off the AMD is the reported noise levels. I despise loud PCs (to the extent that I used to run passively cooled water loops) but my current situation demands a more portable machine. Are these things as bad as I've been told? I've run a GTX 480 with a very gentle fan profile and considerable undervolting, but that was still unbearable.
Essentially I'm asking if a reference cooled 290 would be too loud for someone who can't stand fan noise. I don't mind playing with fan curves or looking at undervolting - so long as this will actually produce results and not just damage limitation.
Afternoon gents. I really could do with some honest user opinions of this card as I'm on the verge of buying one.
I was using a GTX 780 windforce GHZ edition but due to running a Sugo SG08 case it was causing issues with dumping heat and not exhausting - a real shame as the card was probably the nicest I've owned.
I really don't want too much of a step down in terms of performance but I don't want to spend more than the 780 cost either. Realistically this leaves me with two options, the reference 780 (though I'd begrudge paying more than the "superior" aftermarket cooled versions just to get the reference cooler) and the £100 cheaper R9 290.
The one thing putting me off the AMD is the reported noise levels. I despise loud PCs (to the extent that I used to run passively cooled water loops) but my current situation demands a more portable machine. Are these things as bad as I've been told? I've run a GTX 480 with a very gentle fan profile and considerable undervolting, but that was still unbearable.
Essentially I'm asking if a reference cooled 290 would be too loud for someone who can't stand fan noise. I don't mind playing with fan curves or looking at undervolting - so long as this will actually produce results and not just damage limitation.
Yes, it will be too loud for your tastes. Don't let anyone else tell you otherwise. The best we get from reviews regarding noise is, "it's not that bad". you sound like the kind of person who demand way better than "not that bad".
I tried an R9 290 and 3 days later bought a Arctic Hybrid cooler to fix the horrendous noise over 45%. Even 45% is just about bearable but certainly very noticeable.
As someone who owned a Sugo previously I would say it would be too loud for your needs mate.
I assume your case will be on your desk also, with the stock cooler the card just won't be a good fit. You've said it yourself that you're someone who can't stand fan noise and while this is a great card you will be annoyed by the fan noise. I would look at a ref 780 cooled card personally.
Afternoon gents. I really could do with some honest user opinions of this card as I'm on the verge of buying one.
I was using a GTX 780 windforce GHZ edition but due to running a Sugo SG08 case it was causing issues with dumping heat and not exhausting - a real shame as the card was probably the nicest I've owned.
I really don't want too much of a step down in terms of performance but I don't want to spend more than the 780 cost either. Realistically this leaves me with two options, the reference 780 (though I'd begrudge paying more than the "superior" aftermarket cooled versions just to get the reference cooler) and the £100 cheaper R9 290.
The one thing putting me off the AMD is the reported noise levels. I despise loud PCs (to the extent that I used to run passively cooled water loops) but my current situation demands a more portable machine. Are these things as bad as I've been told? I've run a GTX 480 with a very gentle fan profile and considerable undervolting, but that was still unbearable.
Essentially I'm asking if a reference cooled 290 would be too loud for someone who can't stand fan noise. I don't mind playing with fan curves or looking at undervolting - so long as this will actually produce results and not just damage limitation.
^How is the fan below 30% ? Do you have crazy low ambient temps?
For most people it seems to run around 45-55% from what I've read.