• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Radeon R9 290X with Hawaii GPU pictured, has 512-bit 4GB Memory

V-Sync and input lag is just meh though. I am certainly not about to get into sync chat but for me it is horrid. Each to their in this instance but certainly 120Hz is looking the way for me.

The only time i don't use vsync is in twitch shooters. I happily used it for a year and a half in BF3 with no problems at all using the config i sent you. I'm sure the difference is probably more noticeable if you've moved from a 120hz screen though.
 
That's pretty good for no voltage control. My 7970 wouldn't clock that high on stock voltage and that was a golden clocker. Sad to see Elpida memory on there though, shoulda used Hynix. Weird because the last pcb of a 290X i saw had Hynix memory on there. I suppose with the 512bit bus though there is not such a need for the fastest memory. I wonder if the Hynix problems have anything to do with this.
 
Looking at the scores for the normal preset runs on 3dmark11 and firestrike the R9 290X seems to be on a par with the Titans.

Now the strange bit, on the 3dmark11 extreme preset and the Firestrike extreme preset (posted the other day) the R9 290X is a long way short of a Titan.

Going on the benchmarks it looks like the Titan handles graphics heavy benches better.

It will be interesting to see how the R9 290X goes on Heaven 4 at extreme settings and high resolutions, I think it may struggle.

On Valley I would expect the R9 290X to thrash a Titan as it is not very demanding graphics wise and the high fps seem to suit the AMD card.

That was on pre 290X drivers though Kaap. If you're referring to the benchmarks i posted date 22sept. They showed the 290X faster than the titan in games but slower in synthetics. The 290X drivers, 13.11, released after that showed gains in synthetics. Even us with lower spec cards noticed that.

I'm more interested to see how a 290X does at high settings, with high amounts of AA whilst playing the latest games. Synthetic benchmark scores mean nothing unless all you play is synthetic benchmarks. I understand this applies to you though. :p
 
I don't know much about vram manufacturers or about the varying levels of quality. Could you please explain your post?

Hynix great, Elpida not so great. Though you can still get good clocking Elpida, Hynix is the best.

News just in, got a better picture from the HIS 290X. Stop your grinnin and drop your linen.


6jaEELl.jpg.png


Hynix is crap basically, rarely overclocks well.

Not sure if serious...

Samsung FTW on memory :p

Shame its wasted on a 770. :D :p
 
Back
Top Bottom