• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 3D Cache Eight Core 4.5GHz (Socket AM4) Processor - Retail - Go Go Go xD

F1 2021 1440p

Hardware unboxed, 6950XT, F1 2021, 1440p, High TAA. 301 low, 365 average
Me, 3090 Ti, F1 2021, 1440p, High TAA. 327 low, 386 average

l3SVhsGh.jpg

Seems about right, but depends on the game.
As per @GuruJockStrap, some games may favour AMD GPUs and others Nvidia. I didnt think AMD did very well with RTX enabled?

 
Last edited:
Cyberpunk

Hardware unboxed, 6950XT, Cyberpunk, 1080p, High. 129 low, 171 average
Me, 3090 Ti, Cyberpunk, 1080p, High. 84 low, 188 average

Hardware unboxed, 6950XT, Cyberpunk, 1440p, High. 92 low, 109 average
Me, 3090 Ti, Cyberpunk, 1440p, High. 84 low, 153 average

Sure something is up with my lows here. I never noticed it go that low in either benchmark

1080p
wiNXgDwh.jpg

1440p
8eh3uL9h.jpg
 
Which cooler are you using?

If you have a Gigabyte motherboard you could try setting core voltage to 'normal' instead of 'auto'. Gigabyte likes to overvolt compared to other manufacturers which can cause problems. Gamers Nexus confirmed that they were overvolting the 5800X3D compared to MSI.
I have a x370 K7 Motherboard should I set mine to normal?
 
I'm testing without DLSS or FSR.
But with RT on and off for comparison.
GPU will be locked with my 24/7 setting.
Undervolt .925 boost 2685MHz.
This is to eliminate my GPU boosting over that frequency or dropping to give a more accurate result across the board.
 
Test System
5800X3D -30 CO 4450MHz all core boost
4090 FE Undervolt .925mv locked 2685MHz (Clocks don't move during benchmarks)
1:1 FLCK
2x8GB VDIMMS 1.45v
Memory timings as shown below
R6gVSsB.png

Cyberpunk 2077

4K
3733 C14 vs 3600 C16
amFM0pS.png


1440P 3733 C14 vs 3600 C16
VFCLKTt.png


1080P 3733 C14 vs 3600 C16
FXIAcq1.png



 
For some reason (possibly motherboard as I have a B350M Mortar) trying to get C14 running at any memory speed with my Team Group 8 pack dark pro 3600 c16 ram just does not boot. I have managed to get 3800 C16 with pretty good sub timings stable at 1.4v so I use that as my day to day and it has been stable since upgrading to the 5800X3D 6 months ago.

Looking at the timings above I think I could probably tune tRFC down from x10 tRAS to x9 tRAS and make a few more sub timing tweaks (tWR from 16 to 12 maybe and tFAW from 20 to 12) so I might give that a go tonight. Not sure if it will actually improve performance by a noticeable amount.
 
For some reason (possibly motherboard as I have a B350M Mortar) trying to get C14 running at any memory speed with my Team Group 8 pack dark pro 3600 c16 ram just does not boot. I have managed to get 3800 C16 with pretty good sub timings stable at 1.4v so I use that as my day to day and it has been stable since upgrading to the 5800X3D 6 months ago.

Looking at the timings above I think I could probably tune tRFC down from x10 tRAS to x9 tRAS and make a few more sub timing tweaks (tWR from 16 to 12 maybe and tFAW from 20 to 12) so I might give that a go tonight. Not sure if it will actually improve performance by a noticeable amount.
Sounds RAM specific, not CPU or motherboard.
Are you sure C14 works on another board? Or is this specifically a RAM query?
 
Expect so. That was an MSI engineer who posted those results.
If they've managed to up the clocks a 7800X3D should be a beast. The 5800X3D is overkill for my uses currently, need a new GPU to make the most of it but I've got a long list of other things I "need" too!
 
For some reason (possibly motherboard as I have a B350M Mortar) trying to get C14 running at any memory speed with my Team Group 8 pack dark pro 3600 c16 ram just does not boot. I have managed to get 3800 C16 with pretty good sub timings stable at 1.4v so I use that as my day to day and it has been stable since upgrading to the 5800X3D 6 months ago.

Looking at the timings above I think I could probably tune tRFC down from x10 tRAS to x9 tRAS and make a few more sub timing tweaks (tWR from 16 to 12 maybe and tFAW from 20 to 12) so I might give that a go tonight. Not sure if it will actually improve performance by a noticeable amount.
don't these do 1.48v safely? that's certainly what mine is running at. I would up it and see how you find it. here are my 3600/14 timings, at 1.48v, i dialed straight in and left them:

pWU8rAn.png

how many sticks do you have?
 
Last edited:
@timorous, might be best posting in here - https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...-to-8-pack-ripped-edition-32gb-kits.18885405/

Mine require 1.49V in BIOS to be stable at 3800C14, they were stable like that for 2 years+

In Warzone 2 I notice ~4fps difference at 3440 x 1440 going from 3600C16 to 3733 C14.
HOWEVER... I also noticed a bit of random micro stutters at 3733 C14. This may of course been server related or even GPU but wasnt present when I left XMP settings. For ~5 fps (which is unnoticable) i'm leaving XMP 3600C16 for now

XMP (3600C16)
1KtVVzH.jpg

3733C14
77gNqCn.jpg

Building at Hydroelectric next to the buy station looking out the window with my Icarus 556 scoped through the window

It was quite a (fun) challenge getting back to this same window in Warzone 2 with my weapon

Someone needs to buy me a 4090 to bring that GPU time down and push to 97 fps :D

Out of interest, does anyone have Warzone 2, a 5800X3D and a 4090? Do they generally see ~5ms CPU time and ~5ms GPU time or GPU time still higher, meaning a better GPU could increase fps
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom