• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Any noticeable difference in games at 4k?
This is what i was wondering myself. but i haven't pre recorded frames of any games. and the differences probably would be close. so im just going off by feeling. but atm only playing sparking zero and thrones and liberty.
Beginning of december ill try my VR games which should tell me more.
At this point i just wanted to be prepared for the 5090 and pickup any gains along the way since i didnt have a 3d chip yet.
 
so the long and the short of it is with a 4090 you will notice no difference at 2-4k what's ever so if you do a same gen or last gen amd upgrade only if you game at 1080p
 
Last edited:
There’s never a need to upgrade over 1 generation. 5800x3d is perfectly fine too. What will be interesting is zen 6 when they can fit more cores on one ccd.
Exactly. I swear people forget there are processors older than the one they own. lol. Saw one reviewer claim "whats the point of this? yes it's faster than the 7800x3d, but no one should be upgrading from that to this, just throwing their money away" but countless millions of people don't have that CPU. :/
 
There’s never a need to upgrade over 1 generation. 5800x3d is perfectly fine too. What will be interesting is zen 6 when they can fit more cores on one ccd.

This is what I have been wondering as I have a 5800X3D. I'm going to wait to see a few more benchmarks/reviews, my main game is MS Flight Simulator 2020 (soon to be 2024). I am about to upgrade to a 4K monitor too, so will be becoming more GPU bound anyway I imagine. Although flight simulators have always been more CPU intensive. The 3D V-Cache has proven to be very beneficial in FS2020.
 
Last edited:
There’s never a need to upgrade over 1 generation. 5800x3d is perfectly fine too. What will be interesting is zen 6 when they can fit more cores on one ccd.

Yes it's easy to look at the benchmarks and be wowed by the 9800x3d. But at 4k the difference between a 5800x3d and the 9800x3d isn't that wide considering the costs involved to do the upgrade.

A 5800x3d is still a great chip and easily capable of powering the latest titles.

Even the Nvidia 5000 series I should* skip. So far a 4080 is handling 4k just fine with DLSS.

Unless vram requirements or something else changes that needs a 5000 series card I think I should be skipping the 5000 series.

But that's what I said about my 3080. The only reason I upgraded was because of the vram. 10gb was becoming an issue even at 1440p.

But to bring this back to CPUs, if I did opt for a new 5000 series GPU I wouldn't want to pair it with my older platform so an upgrade would start to get very expensive when everything is performing just fine.

How many more years does AM5 have? How many more cpu launches?

AM6 can't be round the corner yet surely?
 
Last edited:
It’s bizarre that they group the results by processor name instead of fastest to slowest like any normal person would.
they normally do, the x3d models throw a wrench in that though. because for some tasks they are far slower than higher numbered CPU's. but for other things like gaming, they are miles and miles ahead.

Tbf, Intel now does something similar with their newest processors being slower than last gen, :cry: at least they changed the name thoo though.

I swear no company model naming makes any sense, Sony has always been the worst,
 
Back
Top Bottom