• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Amd takes away another Nvidia sponsored title

well Phsyx is supported in Unreal Engine 4, it can run via the gpu OR cpu.
Unreal Engine 4 also supports DXR Ray Tracing and DLSS
Unreal Engine 4 also supports Variable Rate Shading/Adaptive Shading

These are Nvidia features baked into the Borderlands 3 game engine, since it's an AMD title it's likely the game will have those things disabled at the engine level
 
Sponsored games means exactly jack ****

Sure it does, it means graphics engineer's from AMD work alongside the development team to build and optimise the game for the hardware.

Amd themselves have released videos from past games explaining this.

It just so happens that while Amd get the PC port optimised Nvidia users also benefit because everything amd adds is open source and works well on either amd or nvidia.

A perfect example that I keep bring up.

Nvidia sponsored titles are know for some of the worst PC ports available, while Amd sponsored titles are know for being some of the best title for performance.

GAMEWORKS!
 
Sure it does, it means graphics engineer's from AMD work alongside the development team to build and optimise the game for the hardware.

Amd themselves have released videos from past games explaining this.

It just so happens that while Amd get the PC port optimised Nvidia users also benefit because everything amd adds is open source and works well on either amd or nvidia.

A perfect example that I keep bring up.

Nvidia sponsored titles are know for some of the worst PC ports available, while Amd sponsored titles are know for being some of the best title for performance.

GAMEWORKS!
What do Amd add that is open source? Or do you just mean things in general?
 
Just because something is open source doesn't mean it's no longer licensed software and part of some other package.
A quote from that article (which I assume you didn't read)

Free, Open-Source, GPU-Accelerated
PhysX will now be the only free, open-source physics solution that takes advantage of GPU acceleration and can handle large virtual environments. It will be available as open source starting Monday, Dec. 3, under the simple BSD-3 license. PhysX solves some serious challenges.

I think you are a little wrapped up with the NVidia hate and refuse to see anything good :)
 
What do Amd add that is open source? Or do you just mean things in general?

Its not always for what you see like TressFX its for what is happening under the hood that AMD provide game developers.

AMD tells it better
Video from last year

Video from 3 years ago, the building box for what is happening today. They is a reason devs are jumping at AMD and its not because of money, its because of an eco system AMD has created optimise for console and PC = less time and money. Like I said this code is also open source and it just so happens that nvidia also get the best out of their GPUs.
I have been keeping a close eye over the last year VEGA vs 10 series time and have noticed AMDs frame latency vs Nvidia in a lot of games is better! What I have also noticed is just how much better Nvidia frame latency is when the game is AMD involved!

AMD simple produce well optimised games for the PC! That is a fact!
 
Its not always for what you see like TressFX its for what is happening under the hood that AMD provide game developers.

AMD tells it better
Video from last year

Video from 3 years ago, the building box for what is happening today. They is a reason devs are jumping at AMD and its not because of money, its because of an eco system AMD has created optimise for console and PC = less time and money. Like I said this code is also open source and it just so happens that nvidia also get the best out of their GPUs.
I have been keeping a close eye over the last year VEGA vs 10 series time and have noticed AMDs frame latency vs Nvidia in a lot of games is better! What I have also noticed is just how much better Nvidia frame latency is when the game is AMD involved!

AMD simple produce well optimised games for the PC! That is a fact!

Proof in pudding will be the eating but if BL3 is more like BL2 running with physx off than with it on then AMD being involved means NV users are gimped.
If AMD choose to allow devs to use physx still as an option or they have an alternate that is just as good then fine, bit I am worried.
 
When Nvidia sponsor a game, it runs poor on their cards, but runs absolute cack on AMDs, their fastest cards, even sturggle to beat Nvidias mid ranges, but when AMD sponsors a game, it rus great on their cards, but it runs even better on Nvidias :p
 
Back
Top Bottom