lol no..... you're stretching those numbers to insane levels to make that argument.
For a start SkyLake IPC is all but a few % the same as Zen, the 7900X has 10 cores, Threadripper has 16, so 60% more.
Threadripper has a base clock of 3.6Ghz, the 7900X 3.3Ghz so Threadripper is at least 60% faster than the 7900X for the same money, it also has 64 PCIe lanes vs 24 in the Intel chip.
If Threadripper overclocks to 4Ghz then the 7900X would have to overclock to 7.25Ghz just to match Threadrippers performance.
PS: even a professional overclocker could not get a binned SkyLake-X to 5Ghz, if you think your just going to pull one off the shelf and get 5Ghz out of it you are deluded. In reality you would probably get 4.6Ghz out of it, thats 15% higher than Threadripper with 60% less cores.
clock for clock ryzen is 10% slower than skylake.
7900x would only operate at base clock if you had no cooler on it, the turbo boost 2.0 is the speed the cpu runs at when at 100% load, so 4.3ghz vs 3.6ghz, (or 4.5ghz in applications that use 1 or 2 cores)
err...he did get 5ghz, with a fairly weak cooler (aio corsair) even replacing the fans with some better ones could drop temps on that thing, an actual good cooler would take it to 5ghz without the delid.
personally I'm after the 7820x anyway, 5ghz on an 8 core just seems absolutely insane to me, glad to see Intel kicking amds arse as usual