Yeah exactly the sort of credibility issue that worries me.
4K ~30fps is 4K gaming haha.
Just not the gaming we want!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yeah exactly the sort of credibility issue that worries me.
U do know global foundries is Amd's own fab right? Amd split their foundry assets into the seperate company in fear of bankruptcy so that they would not loose all of their fabrication plants. Sneeky move which im surprised most people dont remember.
The Furys are 4K gaming GPUs.
U do know global foundries is Amd's own fab right? Amd split their foundry assets into the seperate company in fear of bankruptcy so that they would not loose all of their fabrication plants. Sneeky move which im surprised most people dont remember.
That's true they only owned around 35% of GlobalFoundries from the start and Mubadala owned the majority, and also owns 19.9% of AMD themselves.
https://arstechnica.com/business/20...balfoundries-stake-gets-more-fab-flexibility/
http://blog.timesunion.com/business/sale-of-globalfoundries-could-have-impact-on-amd/71010/amp/
LolYes I know that jesus
Doom actually runs at 50-60 consistently at max 4k (not nightmare). One game thenThey actually are in dx12 and vulkan (medium to high settings no AA 60fps+)
Doom actually runs at 50-60 consistently at max 4k (not nightmare). One game then
Good gawd guys
More so Cyber-Mav. It's like, you do know you are talking out of you backside right? Lol
Yea. Polaris was poorer than expected and I think one of the big reasons was GloFo.Aye so to say Globo is still AMD's is rather silly. Like saying TSMC is AMD's to some extent.
I just hope they're not locked with GF for too long though, I'm not too fond of the results of their 14nm FinFet process.
TSMC might be better for GPUs.
I'm expecting all but the new flagship GPU to be cheaper rebrands on the rx4XX series, hope I'm wrong though, I want to replace my r9 290 with a another £300 GPU but there's nothing that warrants the price to be a worth while upgrade yet (currently gaming at 60hz 1080p)
sorry, you came across as being clueless.Yes I know that jesus
Aye so to say Globo is still AMD's is rather silly. Like saying TSMC is AMD's to some extent.
I just hope they're not locked with GF for too long though, I'm not too fond of the results of their 14nm FinFet process.
TSMC might be better for GPUs.
Aye so to say Globo is still AMD's is rather silly. Like saying TSMC is AMD's to some extent.
I just hope they're not locked with GF for too long though, I'm not too fond of the results of their 14nm FinFet process.
TSMC might be better for GPUs.
Mate, I never once stated GloFlo belongs to AMD...did you even read any of my posts.global foundries is not AMD, AMD doesnt have any fabrication plants in their name anymore as i explained before. they split/sold of thier plants to avoid loosing them if they went bankrupt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_semiconductor_fabrication_plants
no AMD name on those plants in the list.
Np, it was late and I was tired as soon as I had posted it I thought I should have said it differently.sorry, you came across as being clueless.
At moment TSMC but if GF gets help from Samsung in the future who knows as the process are very closethats cool, but which foundry is doing better? TSMC or GloFo?