• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yup, everything thing still seems on track; especially after Dr. Su said during the Investor Q&A start of the month that they're shipping Vega Product"S" before end of Q2.

Also can we just remember again that their enterprise "Telsa" card will have 13 TFLOPS of Single Precision, if they stick to the norm, it means the enterprise is going to be clocked lower than the high-end gaming versions, and the gaming ones won't have 2x FP16 performance, or enterprise features/tech.

Indeed. Although I believe they said the gaming cards will have 2xFP16 enabled.
 
Sure it makes sense they dont expect or want even a gaming audience on a business presentation. Just jumping the gun here

Today, they did the same with Tomb Raider. I am now ready to believe that the HBCC works with no changes to the game (i.e. it can be done by AMD in their drivers/software).

Let's hope it's true...
I believe [*]


Heres a consumer type email I got, rx560 is released today. I said those refreshed cards being out in April kinda showed vega was not close like May 5th as it would overshadow but does that also apply to this Frontier edition vs consumer versions.
We are separate markets so it wont conflict, do they have the capacity
i5OBZKo.png

Greetings, /r/AMD! By now, you will have heard: we at the Radeon Technologies Group at AMD just announced the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition.

We know you must have a ton of questions, and we want to answer them.

This Thursday, May 18 at 2 to 3 PM PST, we’re doing an AMA for you to ask anything on the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. Raja Koduri (/u/gfxchiptweeter), Senior VP and Chief Architect of Radeon Technologies Group, will be hosting the AMA, so be sure to join us this Thursday.

See you then!
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6bklro/we_are_radeon_technologies_group_at_amd_and_were/


This current presentator could read bedtime stories tbh :D He is trying to be calm but its not the way to give speech details and keep attention afaik
 
yzzbgws0vxxy.png


Hah! :D
 
Today we’re announcing the first of several Vega architecture-based products to roll out this summer, and soon we’ll be launching Radeon Instinct, Radeon Pro, and Radeon RX flavors of Vega. But today’s Vega is just a little different. Let me tell you why.

So much for AMD being Doomed lol
 
Indeed. Although I believe they said the gaming cards will have 2xFP16 enabled.

That would be rather needless, unless they have something up their sleeve for it.

What's also interesting is how Vega Frontier matches up against NVIDIA's new Telsa V100.
~20% faster while not available until near end of the year, costing significantly more; and being dramatically larger.
~510mm2 vs 815mm2

It's also PCIe vs NVLINK; the V100 PCIe card will be slower than the NVLINK one, just like the P100 NVL was faster than the PCIe.

Never mind the V100 has a yield of 1 per 12" wafer; that cost will be massive, and supply low. Which is why NVIDIA were taking pre-orders already. It's essentially built to order.

Outside of NVIDIA's new Tensor Processors for mixed precision workloads, Vega actually looks really decent in comparison, especially given the size and R&D budget.
 
That would be rather needless, unless they have something up their sleeve for it.

What's also interesting is how Vega Frontier matches up against NVIDIA's new Telsa V100.
~20% faster while not available until near end of the year, costing significantly more; and being dramatically larger.
~510mm2 vs 815mm2

It's also PCIe vs NVLINK; the V100 PCIe card will be slower than the NVLINK one, just like the P100 NVL was faster than the PCIe.

Never mind the V100 has a yield of 1 per 12" wafer; that cost will be massive, and supply low. Which is why NVIDIA were taking pre-orders already. It's essentially built to order.

Outside of NVIDIA's new Tensor Processors for mixed precision workloads, Vega actually looks really decent in comparison, especially given the size and R&D budget.

i don't think AMD r Nvidia would be able to compete with Google's TPU for targeted workload, don't think google would leave much of the Tensor market for 2 other players.
 
i don't think AMD r Nvidia would be able to compete with Google's TPU for targeted workload, don't think google would leave much of the Tensor market for 2 other players.

Exactly, which means Vega is looking extremely well compared to the behemoth V100.
Over 300mm2 larger, and only 20% faster 25 TFLOPS vs 30 TFLOPS FP16; never mind the cost difference.
 
And, thanks to GloFlo, consuming 50% more power than a 1080Ti :p

Thanks to GloFo our overclocked Ryzen 8/16t burns less power than the overclocked Intel i7 4/8t. Even when compared to the more power efficient 7700K, let alone the power hungry 6700K or 4790K for more MT perf.

While the 6900K burns twice the amount of power at 4Ghz for less perf also!!!!


I can see your statement, out of the window been dragged by the foxes right now....
 
Exactly, which means Vega is looking extremely well compared to the behemoth V100.
Over 300mm2 larger, and only 20% faster 25 TFLOPS vs 30 TFLOPS FP16; never mind the cost difference.

I am really looking forward to seeing how the consumer Volta chips stack up against Vega. Nvidia has added a proper hardware scheduler like GCN has, meaning there's a LOT more register files and interconnects plus scheduling logic on the chip now. Last time they tried this we got... Fermi. Luckily for Nvidia, the 12nm process will mask a lot of that, but we should still be able to get some sense of what it translates to.

Besides, we'll soon be comparing 7nm chips on a level playing field (as early as 2H 2018 / 1H 2019)...
 
HBCC best GPU feature in the last decade!! Very well possible. The test so far have seen a massive improvement. I agree with @JediFragger I would loose the 5%-10% slower if min FPS was higher all the time.
 
Last edited:
HBCC best GPU feature in the last decade!! Very well possible. The test so far have seen a massive improvement. I agree with @JediFragger I would loose the 5%-10% slower is min FPS with higher all the time.

Same here! If it's 10% slower in averages, but has improved minimums over 1080Ti, I'll be very happy.
I look forward to reviews, especially in video work as well; AMD is already good there; and seeing the compute on Vega I hope to get a smashing card.
 
Thanks to GloFo our overclocked Ryzen 8/16t burns less power than the overclocked Intel i7 4/8t. Even when compared to the more power efficient 7700K, let alone the power hungry 6700K or 4790K for more MT perf.

While the 6900K burns twice the amount of power at 4Ghz for less perf also!!!!


I can see your statement, out of the window been dragged by the foxes right now....
Meanwhile, in GPU land...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom