Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yup, everything thing still seems on track; especially after Dr. Su said during the Investor Q&A start of the month that they're shipping Vega Product"S" before end of Q2.
Also can we just remember again that their enterprise "Telsa" card will have 13 TFLOPS of Single Precision, if they stick to the norm, it means the enterprise is going to be clocked lower than the high-end gaming versions, and the gaming ones won't have 2x FP16 performance, or enterprise features/tech.
I believe [*]Today, they did the same with Tomb Raider. I am now ready to believe that the HBCC works with no changes to the game (i.e. it can be done by AMD in their drivers/software).
Let's hope it's true...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6bklro/we_are_radeon_technologies_group_at_amd_and_were/Greetings, /r/AMD! By now, you will have heard: we at the Radeon Technologies Group at AMD just announced the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition.
We know you must have a ton of questions, and we want to answer them.
This Thursday, May 18 at 2 to 3 PM PST, we’re doing an AMA for you to ask anything on the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. Raja Koduri (/u/gfxchiptweeter), Senior VP and Chief Architect of Radeon Technologies Group, will be hosting the AMA, so be sure to join us this Thursday.
See you then!
Indeed. Although I believe they said the gaming cards will have 2xFP16 enabled.
I loved that die shot!Epyc is fast....
That would be rather needless, unless they have something up their sleeve for it.
What's also interesting is how Vega Frontier matches up against NVIDIA's new Telsa V100.
~20% faster while not available until near end of the year, costing significantly more; and being dramatically larger.
~510mm2 vs 815mm2
It's also PCIe vs NVLINK; the V100 PCIe card will be slower than the NVLINK one, just like the P100 NVL was faster than the PCIe.
Never mind the V100 has a yield of 1 per 12" wafer; that cost will be massive, and supply low. Which is why NVIDIA were taking pre-orders already. It's essentially built to order.
Outside of NVIDIA's new Tensor Processors for mixed precision workloads, Vega actually looks really decent in comparison, especially given the size and R&D budget.
So which versions of VEGA were the gaming demos they showed
i don't think AMD r Nvidia would be able to compete with Google's TPU for targeted workload, don't think google would leave much of the Tensor market for 2 other players.
And, thanks to GloFlo, consuming 50% more power than a 1080Ti
Exactly, which means Vega is looking extremely well compared to the behemoth V100.
Over 300mm2 larger, and only 20% faster 25 TFLOPS vs 30 TFLOPS FP16; never mind the cost difference.
HBCC best GPU feature in the last decade!! Very well possible. The test so far have seen a massive improvement. I agree with @JediFragger I would loose the 5%-10% slower is min FPS with higher all the time.
Meanwhile, in GPU land...Thanks to GloFo our overclocked Ryzen 8/16t burns less power than the overclocked Intel i7 4/8t. Even when compared to the more power efficient 7700K, let alone the power hungry 6700K or 4790K for more MT perf.
While the 6900K burns twice the amount of power at 4Ghz for less perf also!!!!
I can see your statement, out of the window been dragged by the foxes right now....