• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Vega is gonna be late(late spring/early summer), what I'd like to see is this:

Big Vega(420-450mm²)

1) Full fat chip beats GTX1080 by 20% at £600

2) Cut down chip matches GTX1080 at £450

Small Vega(300-320mm²):

1) Full fat chip matches GTX1070 at £340

2) Cut down chip matches Fury X at £270

Give or take some on the performance. Nvidia will be able to lower prices to compete, along with a less expensive GP102(1080Ti), but it'll at least still mean lower price-for-performance for everybody, no matter who you pick. It wont get AMD ahead, but if they're that late, I dont think much will, unless they can beat what I just proposed by a fair margin.
 
Last edited:
Yup, i took months to do Evil Within as well :D

I started the Zero remaster and was playing it in between my online games. Never got past the train stage. Decided i will wait until i got more time to get it done over a few days. Love the old School Resident Evil games. Done Resident Evil Remaster over a few days which would be the third version i have completed off that game. Ps1/Gamecube and then PC.
 
If Vega is gonna be late(late spring/early summer), what I'd like to see is this:

Big Vega(420-450mm²)

1) Full fat chip beats GTX1080 by 20% at £600

2) Cut down chip matches GTX1080 at £450

Small Vega(300-320mm²):

1) Full fat chip matches GTX1070 at £340

2) Cut down chip matches Fury X at £270

Give or take some on the performance. Nvidia will be able to lower prices to compete, along with a less expensive GP102(1080Ti), but it'll at least still mean lower price-for-performance for everybody, no matter who you pick. It wont get AMD ahead, but if they're that late, I dont think much will, unless they can beat what I just proposed by a fair margin.

So... AMD's cheapest card should be £270...

Given that we expect Vega to be the 5xx series, then why should the cheapest of these cards be more expensive than all of the 4xx series?

That doesn't make sense. Should the cheapest 6xx card be more expensive than the 590?
 
So... AMD's cheapest card should be £270...

Given that we expect Vega to be the 5xx series, then why should the cheapest of these cards be more expensive than all of the 4xx series?

That doesn't make sense. Should the cheapest 6xx card be more expensive than the 590?

Polaris will most likely make up the lower cards.
 
Polaris will most likely make up the lower cards.

Ah, "AMD Rebrandeon" again.

But I don't expect this will be true. Small Vega is said to be only 1TF or so faster than the 480. Therefore I personally expect Vega 11 to replace the 480, not coexist with it.

And if that's the case, then £270 for the cheapest small Vega is nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Ah, "AMD Rebrandeon" again.

But I don't expect this will be true. Small Vega is said to be only 1TF or so faster than the 480. Therefore I personally expect Vega 11 to replace the 480, not coexist with it.

And if that's the case, then £270 for the cheapest small Vega is nonsense.

That would put it around a GTX 1070.

Sold! happy days :)
 
Ah, "AMD Rebrandeon" again.

But I don't expect this will be true. Small Vega is said to be only 1TF or so faster than the 480. Therefore I personally expect Vega 11 to replace the 480, not coexist with it.

And if that's the case, then £270 for the cheapest small Vega is nonsense.

Which is pretty fast if there is improvements all around. Polaris still has plenty left in it if the rumored power reductions are true. Pascal is just about as close to a Maxwell rebrand as you can get but it does the job fine. It's already shown that the rx480 is starting to get the upper hand over the 1060 so with further improvements and clock boost's Polaris is all Amd need at the low to mid level.
 
Last edited:
That would put it around a GTX 1070.

Sold! happy days :)

So you've basically accepted nVidia's new pricing, where a 4th tier GPU can be sold for £400.

GP100 > Titan PX > 1080 > 1070.

And so AMD can release a 4th tier card for £270 (cut-down Vega 11), and that's a result.

People sure are crazy these days.

e: What about 480 owners? Those who paid £250 just a couple months ago for a 5.8 TF card. Do you think the 580, if it's a 7TF Vega 11 at £270, do you think those 480 owners will want to upgrade at that cost and performance?

Or are we in Intel CPU land now, where you only upgrade every 5 years to get good increases/£ spent.
 
Last edited:
I started the Zero remaster and was playing it in between my online games. Never got past the train stage. Decided i will wait until i got more time to get it done over a few days. Love the old School Resident Evil games. Done Resident Evil Remaster over a few days which would be the third version i have completed off that game. Ps1/Gamecube and then PC.

Cracking games, i just do a couple of hrs a day, why it takes me so long to finish them :D

I got off the train on Zero, now into the training facility, reminds me of the mansion.
 
So you've basically accepted nVidia's new pricing, where a 4th tier GPU can be sold for £400.

GP100 > Titan PX > 1080 > 1070.

And so AMD can release a 4th tier card for £270 (cut-down Vega 11), and that's a result.

People sure are crazy these days.

I couldn't give a flying #### about Nvidia's pricing structure because the only way it will ever change is if enough people stop buying their cards and that's never going to happen because far too many are sucked in by their branding.
 
So you've basically accepted nVidia's new pricing, where a 4th tier GPU can be sold for £400.

GP100 > Titan PX > 1080 > 1070.

And so AMD can release a 4th tier card for £270 (cut-down Vega 11), and that's a result.

People sure are crazy these days.

Unfortunately people accept things very easily nowadays.
 
Unfortunately people accept things very easily nowadays.

I don't know why I continue to be surprised by this tho.

Just about everyone I know spends £360 on their phone contract each year.

So what's £270 on a new GPU each year...

And yet record numbers of people are in chronic debt... Maybe that's why!
 
I couldn't give a flying #### about Nvidia's pricing structure because the only way it will ever change is if enough people stop buying their cards and that's never going to happen because far too many are sucked in by their branding.

Yup, it won't happen, i remember when they started the 1k Titan brand, they couldn't believe it when they were flying off the shelves, they couldn't keep up with demand, so no wonder they've now raised em to £1200 :D
 
Last edited:
If Vega is gonna be late(late spring/early summer), what I'd like to see is this:

Big Vega(420-450mm²)

1) Full fat chip beats GTX1080 by 20% at £600

2) Cut down chip matches GTX1080 at £450

I would say full fat needs to be about 30-40% better than 1080. With all the extra time and maturing of process tech, new architecture and HBM2, this is not a big ask. But of course this is my opinion, hope people do not get upset by it, I think it is a realistic expectation :p:D


Yup, i took months to do Evil Within as well :D

I started it recently :D


I started the Zero remaster and was playing it in between my online games. Never got past the train stage. Decided i will wait until i got more time to get it done over a few days. Love the old School Resident Evil games. Done Resident Evil Remaster over a few days which would be the third version i have completed off that game. Ps1/Gamecube and then PC.

The train section is like what 15, max 30 minutes :p:D


I couldn't give a flying #### about Nvidia's pricing structure because the only way it will ever change is if enough people stop buying their cards and that's never going to happen because far too many are sucked in by their branding.

My decision had nothing to do with branding, purely price for performance :)
 
I would say full fat needs to be about 30-40% better than 1080. With all the extra time and maturing of process tech, new architecture and HBM2, this is not a big ask. But of course this is my opinion, hope people do not get upset by it, I think it is a realistic expectation :p:D

Zen will only just match Haswell, we think, despite Haswell being years old and Zen being a brand new architecture.

So if you apply a similar realism to Vega, I think their top card narrowly beating a 1080 is reasonable. Anything more is a bonus.
 
It beat a 16 thread 6900K Broadwell ^^^

Didn't you have a 780 and now own a 970? :D

Its worse than that, i had a 290 for 2 years (Powercolor PCS+) great card..., but i wanted an upgrade, all AMD did was rename the 290 the 390, i still wanted a change so thought i would give Nvidia a try again after a few years with AMD.

I have had the Gigabyte WF 970 for little over a year now, again great card but i'm looking at going back to AMD now.
 
Last edited:
I loved it, even the DLCs, best game ive played in a while tbh :)

Ah cool. On chapter 3 now, going to have a go in a while :)


Zen will only just match Haswell, we think, despite Haswell being years old and Zen being a brand new architecture.

So if you apply a similar realism to Vega, I think their top card narrowly beating a 1080 is reasonable. Anything more is a bonus.

I do not think there is a correlation between the two IMO.

Its worse than that, i had a 290 for 2 years (powercolor PCS+) great card..., but i wanted an upgrade, all AMD did was rename the 290 the 390, i still wanted a change so thought i would give Nvidia a try again after a few years with AMD.

I have had the Gigabyte WF 970 for little over a year now, again great card but i'm looking at going back to AMD now.


That sounds like a bit of a sidegrade. I guess the 970 OC helped. Now 1070, that was a proper nice upgrade from a 290 :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom