So why wasn't it an issue until some Youtube video wanting likes and views? I'm not saying there are or are not differences but it's going to be minuscule. These companies aren't going to put out hardware with huge variances.
Then there are some who are so convinced what they want to see. All, I've seen so far is some with a little more dense foliage versus another and if it's anything to go by what has currently been going on in the Guru3D forums... Is seeing and finding out the vast amounts of peoples monitors that is badly setup that they've never known. Until now.
These are the very same discussions I've seen years ago when the IMDb forums used to exist. Films getting slated reviews because their TV's were crushing shadow detail. I'm still seeing these same discussions with Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Then finding other peoples videos with jacked up brightness both PC and console because they've been setup wrong.
I remember reading some professional calibrators on AVSForum years ago measuring a PS4 and PS3 as well as Xbox 360 or One with reference TVs and there was very little error between them. Yes some variances but nothing to the differences like some claim between AMD pops compared to NVIDIA. Obviously some are going to render a bit more graphics on screen or a little less dependant on how well they perform according to the developers.
So many difference sceneraios to all this it shows how complicated it actually is. We also don't know who is colourblind and partially.
https://www.xrite.com/hue-test
We also don't know what computer screens and TVs has been giving out errors and displaying them wrong plus the age of the electronics. As the scenarios can become complicated.