Yep. It is an educated guess. We will see how it goes but the way I see it is RT is such a small part of the silicon in the 2000 series that even if they just used a bit more of it they can double the performance. But I am sure they will have improved the architecture also to boot. Let's be honest. The RT performance on the 2000 series is sorely lacking. They will need to at least double this and it will not be hard to do.I will tell you to stop acting daft as you will definitely get the boost in gpu performance. The problem i see is you are doing a lot of guess work on RT performance along with price. The lessons i have learned is expect to be unimpressed as time passes and be willing to pay a lot more for it.
On the colours you are most probably right and everyone should do what you are saying before they make a proper decision. proper calibration tools are more money though. I think Nvidia should have it right out of the box though and we wouldn't be talking. I feel no real need to do it with AMD as the visuals to me are fine.
I never said i am exclusively AMD, my first PC which got me into PC gaming was Nvidia. It's just when i buy i don't see why i would spend the extra on them. I don't buy as often as you though so we have different habits. Each to there own man. It's been a lol for ages in here as you can see due to tech slowing down imo but respect you as you make sense.
We will see, I am confident in my prediction, enough so that I will reply to you once the reviews come out and say I told you so
![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/wink.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/tongue.gif)
![Big Grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/biggrin.gif)
As for the colours, what makes you think AMD's more vibrant colours are the correct colours? I actually think the opposite could potentially be true. For the record I like AMD's out of the box colours better too by the way.