• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Refresh) 3900XT/3800XT/3600XT

New "leak"

RYZEN 9 3900XT - 4.1GHz base, 4.8GHz boost
RYZEN 7 3800XT - 4.2GHz base, 4.7GHz boost
RYZEN 5 3600XT - 4.0GHz base, 4.7GHz boost


Oh well for the time 3900xt to take the top AMD gaming CPU crown again, we had a good but short run, 3950x
 
New "leak"

RYZEN 9 3900XT - 4.1GHz base, 4.8GHz boost
RYZEN 7 3800XT - 4.2GHz base, 4.7GHz boost
RYZEN 5 3600XT - 4.0GHz base, 4.7GHz boost


Oh well for the time 3900xt to take the top AMD gaming CPU crown again, we had a good but short run, 3950x

Bodes well for the 4000 series.
 
Here is a comparison of the new XT models vs the regular Ryzen 3000 CPU's.
343fdzah73.jpg
 
Here is a comparison of the new XT models vs the regular Ryzen 3000 CPU's.
343fdzah73.jpg

If correct that will hurt Intel's 10 series sales. Luckily no funds available so I won't be tempted into an upgrade. Maybe Christmas 2021 I'll think about it. Big Navi or Ampere to save up for first.
 
The main part is going to be the 3600XT (if naming is correct) in terms of volume, value and difference. The R5 3600 was the one to get, not the 3600X due to the small difference in performance, but with the XT at ~£199 and a much higher boost, and better base clocks then the XT part becomes a much more convincing argument.

The 3700X at the new low cost should also be attractive to people in the ~£239 bracket who want more cores/threads, and not the extra speed, but there are weird things going on with the 3800X pricing as well, so where will that end up if the XT version is priced at ~£299 to compete with the 10600K/10700.

If they stick to the release date, then it will be a year to the day since the 3000 series launched.
 
The main part is going to be the 3600XT (if naming is correct) in terms of volume, value and difference. The R5 3600 was the one to get, not the 3600X due to the small difference in performance, but with the XT at ~£199 and a much higher boost, and better base clocks then the XT part becomes a much more convincing argument.

The 3700X at the new low cost should also be attractive to people in the ~£239 bracket who want more cores/threads, and not the extra speed, but there are weird things going on with the 3800X pricing as well, so where will that end up if the XT version is priced at ~£299 to compete with the 10600K/10700.

If they stick to the release date, then it will be a year to the day since the 3000 series launched.

Where are you seeing the 3600XT at £199 and 3700x at £239?
 
I think these TX versions are especially great for first gen Ryzen owners on B350/X370 boards since now that the Ryzen 4000 series won’t support them, they have an option to upgrade into faster Ryzen 3000 models.
 
I think these boost clocks are pretty meaningless, TBH.

..all that really matters is the sustainable, all core clock speeds whilst under load.

4.7Ghz for a few seconds isn't much good to anyone,really.
 
Looks like this refresh is not just a simple core clock boost.

Infinity fabric speed is up rated too, sitting at 2000mhz on the FCLK, so you can now game with 4000mhz memory on your 4.8ghz 3900XT

AMD seems to be intent on taking Intel's gaming crown without even having to use Zen3 lmao
 
Looks like this refresh is not just a simple core clock boost.

Infinity fabric speed is up rated too, sitting at 2000mhz on the FCLK, so you can now game with 4000mhz memory on your 4.8ghz 3900XT

AMD seems to be intent on taking Intel's gaming crown without even having to use Zen3 lmao

Source? If this is true then say goodbye to Intel. A 2,000 FCLK is legit going to murder them.
 
Back
Top Bottom