Yeah I know. I thought that and the MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon were regarded as the best budget boards?
Gigabyte B450 AORUS Pro is better.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yeah I know. I thought that and the MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon were regarded as the best budget boards?
Nope. The Aorus if you want budget as @4K8KW10 said.Yeah I know. I thought that and the MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon were regarded as the best budget boards?
Gigabyte B450 AORUS Pro is better.
As others have said, either that or the Gigabyte B450 AORUS Pro. The MSI was the most recommended because it had BIOS Flashback - with the Gigabyte there's no guarantee you'll get one with a compatible BIOS. I assume there's a much higher chance of getting a compatible one now we're in October.Yeah I know. I thought that and the MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon were regarded as the best budget boards?
so new chipset is needed (PCIe 4.0)
Yes, and all the AMD coming out also.2020's GPU (Nvidia's) will most likely be PCIe 4.0.
Yes, and all the AMD coming out also.
2020's GPU (Nvidia's) will most likely be PCIe 4.0.
They will also be PCI-E 3 backwards compatible. The question then becomes whether 4 offers any real world advantage over 3.Yes, and all the AMD coming out also.
They will also be PCI-E 3 backwards compatible.
RAM & Infinity Fabric. But nothing critical if you are at mid 60 range.
eg I am on 63ns latency, having tuned my 3600C16 RAM to the Dram Calculator settings for 3800C16 with 1900IF. (66nm at stock XMP 3600C16 with IF 1800).
A 9900K is at around 56ns however we shouldn't compare apples & oranges. Intel mainstream platform is on Ring topology still with all the limitations that includes. (aka cannot scale easily with over 10 cores).
AMD even on AM4 platform is moving into HEDT territory when comes to overall performance. And there even with quad channel ram the MESH topology based CPUs are at 79ns (9980XE is a good example), with really good ram settings also (3600C16).
That to answer your previous question.
Regarding Dram Calculator is paramount to use it if you want to succeed on tuning the ram. It doesn't only tell you timings etc, but power configuration and how to set other subsystems for maximum performance.
Is a great tool including a memory benchmark/test also.
If you use Thaiphoon Burner, read your memory module and post the image here, I can use the Dram calculator to show you what would be a good setup for your ram. However it won't be 100% accurate, as it required to read your RAM settings on it's own.
Not sure what your point is? I said it was backward compatible and you then say it's backwards compatible?
They will run on PCIe 1.1 x16 physical x8 electrical slot.........
PCIe 4.0 requires active cooling on most boards and X570 has a hefty early adopter tax attached to it. However, older chipsets work fine too. With Zen 4 though, AM4 compatibility will be gone. They'll probably end up having say an X770 chipset with PCIe 5.0 and a B750 or X760 chipset with PCIe 4.0, and that'll be the main (if not only) delineation between the top two chipsets.
X760 - First time ever seen, water cooling built into motherboard (to cool the chipset).