Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Mine is at 1.3625v and 4.3 all core but it shows on every monitoring software as 1.10v max, but my scores are all high like they should be. There is a bug somewhere
Weird. All my monitoring software reports exactly what I set things too.
A small part of me wonders if I am doing something wrong, but not like I am a noob, been overclocking every cpu I have ever had the past 20+ years. I kind of got lucky with my 4770K also which I run at 4.7GHz for many years. It was close to doing 4.8GHz also, but just needed too much voltage so was never comfortable with that. A lot of people as I recall struggled getting 4,5GHz.
On cpu z bench you should be getting 8000 ish multi and 540 ish single core, is that right ?Weird. All my monitoring software reports exactly what I set things too.
Just need someone else from here that has a 3600 to run some benchmarks to confirm my scores are correct for the said OC’s I have. Maybe I will post in the Ryzen 3600 thread.
A small part of me wonders if I am doing something wrong, but not like I am a noob, been overclocking every cpu I have ever had the past 20+ years. I kind of got lucky with my 4770K also which I run at 4.7GHz for many years. It was close to doing 4.8GHz also, but just needed too much voltage so was never comfortable with that. A lot of people as I recall struggled getting 4,5GHz.
One of the things I always do is buy retail so I know it is not a chip that has been attempted to be binned
I did try a 4.6GHz on one core a few days ago. It was fine until I run Cinebench which threw out an error halfway through its run. Cannot remember what voltage I had, I think it was 1.4v, but I am guessing I would need something like 1.45v to try and get that stable which I am not comfortable with. Rather have all core 4.4GHz at 1.25v than a single core at 4.6GHz that makes a lot more heat and noise.
Edit:
Just hope it is not 9700k lookalike and AMD haven't gone full Intel already
Get my mobo (Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE). Good price for performance imo. Can be had for under £190 and has great VRMs
No problem
Not for you motherboard?
I get the right boosts with abba, but i get much much better temps and performance with an all core overclock and less little weird stutters as It decides to change boost speed mid game
No evidence as far as I know that they'll jump straight to 1.0.0.4. When 1.0.0.3ABB was released, it took an extra 3 weeks to come out on the X470 Taichi Ultimate compared to the rest of their X470 boards, which were already late compared to the X570 ones of course. I really don't even expect a new UEFI before December.
But on stock settings I get 4150ish boost on one core and temps keep spiking to 60’s as soon as there is some light activity going due to vcore jumping to 1.44/1.46v. I can easily do all core 4200MHz and not have the temps go above 40C for the same workloads.
Agreed.
