Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I wonder how much better the 5900x will be over the 3900x? I guess we shall find out today
Same here, 3700x to 5800x for me, unless the 12 core can do something to have the same latency as the 8 core when a game/application doesn't use more than that.I'm most excited for 5800X, I want too see the clock speed and single CCX module performance of that bad boy
Same here, 3700x to 5800x for me, unless the 12 core can do something to have the same latency as the 8 core when a game/application doesn't use more than that.
I wonder how much better the 5900x will be over the 3900x? I guess we shall find out today
3900x on the same clock as 3800x have higher FPS because of much more cache, so 2 ccd aren't problem. 5900x will behave same when compared to 5800x.Same here, 3700x to 5800x for me, unless the 12 core can do something to have the same latency as the 8 core when a game/application doesn't use more than that.
3900x on the same clock as 3800x have higher FPS because of much more cache, so 2 ccd aren't problem. 5900x will behave same when compared to 5800x.
We will have to see. My hunch is the 5800X will edge out the 5900X running 16 threads or less.
apparently they didn't change the IO die.. so all improvements are coming from the shared cache in the ccdI think you're right the physical distance would make me think that despite the cache two CCDs would have a penalty. If not AMD are on to a winner.
apparently they didn't change the IO die.. so all improvements are coming from the shared cache in the ccd
AFAIK 3900x is better for gaming thatn 3800x
Yes.. I think thats one of the things they can improve.Interesting, potential for another iteration with an improved IO die maybe?
Yes.. I think thats one of the things they can improve.
Performance is there.. Now its just a matter of latency and software support
I thought the IO die was on 14nm because they've contracted with Global Foundries until 2023, if so I wouldn't expect much change there.Interesting, potential for another iteration with an improved IO die maybe?
Yeah, there isn't a big benefit available (aside from the contractual obligations I mentioned).Not much reason to change IO die on AM4. Seems to work fine. Setting DDR4 overclock records and supporting Zen 3 in becoming fastest CPU ever.
And then AM5 and DDR5 will need a new IO die anyway.