Every single post you make is 100% made up.paper launch and actual launch always a few months in between.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Every single post you make is 100% made up.paper launch and actual launch always a few months in between.
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, AMD are masters at it.
Every single post you make is 100% made up.
so pedantic are many here
date first proposed is never the date the cpus actually launch. always been the same. so pedantic are many here. check history of cpu launches. they never are when they first say and are often a couple of months of later.
I think you're confusing announcement and paper launch.they never are when they first say and are often a couple of months of later.
I think you've missed a decimal point somewhere...Someone with an IQ of 243 doesn't confuse things.
Someone with an IQ of 243 doesn't confuse things.
its always a few months after. this has happened since cpus went on sale. so summer will probably not be june but more like august or september.
i think you are over exaggerating . the basics of this are they say we launching it may 20th we all know it wont launch then. its always a few months after. this has happened since cpus went on sale. so summer will probably not be june but more like august or september.
I could probably link the CPUz results sheet. There were tests with and without HT (iRacing on quad cores hates HT as it interrupts the main physics/render core) as well as Ryzen with and without SMT, though SMT off had zero influence on the results. That was more likely due to high enough core counts anyway. Coffee Lake at 4GHz was the highest with 472 but Skylake had 468 and Kaby had 459. A noticeable difference. Ryzen 1xxx was at 462 and Ryzen 2 was more all over the place but avg'd 457. I think Ryzen 2 was more wild due to XFR being much more in use than Ryzen 1. However there's literally 2% covering all the CPU's there. Same results with Cinebench and other reasonable single thread workload's. 7zip obviously not used as compression/decompression is very different on the different CPU's. Something of note though was the decryption (heavily affects load times for iRacing) characteristics favours Ryzen. Coffee Lake beats Ryzen normally due to frequency, but when 4GHz normalized Ryzen beats Coffee Lake. Was a little taken aback by that.Oh ok, it's interesting that you've actually seen a regression in IPC in your testing.
Did everyone use the same ram? speed, timings, amount? and the same or similar boards? Turbo boost off for intel? Cores disabled on ryzen and higher core count intel parts?
date first proposed is never the date the cpus actually launch. always been the same. so pedantic are many here. check history of cpu launches. they never are when they first say and are often a couple of months of later.
Already asked for an answer, you choose to ignore the question. Ryzen 1700/X/1800X announced 22nd Feb' and were on sale 2nd March, 2000 series was a similar affair, no where near even one month, are you blind or just being ignorant?
i think you are over exaggerating . the basics of this are they say we launching it may 20th we all know it wont launch then. its always a few months after. this has happened since cpus went on sale. so summer will probably not be june but more like august or september.