Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2018
- Posts
- 2,821
A520 might be the go to board for budget builds if the VRMs are good.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
In a year or two I wouldn't want a drive that's much slower than a console and there's nothing you can do about it re upgrades.
What are they likely to offer in X670 and B670? The AM4 is ageing. I can’t see them retaining AM4 while adding DDR5 support.It would be a very unusual step to release a new CPU line without an accompanying chipset so I would expect an X670 and maybe even a B650 later on if they decide to do a refresh.
Honestly I tried googling this but I couldn't find an answer, but I'm also bad at googling. Will there be another chipset releasing with Zen 3, or is X570 the last AM4 chipset before they move to a new socket? I'm thinking about upgrading to X570 now if it's the latter, but I don't want to do that if there's going to be another batch of new motherboards coming out.
X670 i think.
Possibly but then most people that would be buying A520 on a budget wont be splashing out on a Gen4 NMVE and B450 offers the rest with overclock support.A520 might be the go to board for budget builds if the VRMs are good.
Why? PC Ports are still going to target the lowest possible denominator - Hard Drives for a long time to come. At best requirements may move up to SATA SSD, PCI-E 4.0 NVMe are not going to be a requirement for PC Gaming any time soon.
Pretty sure a gen 3 nvme will be perfectly fine for years to come but good luck if you want to go £60+ on a motherboard and £150+ atleast on a super fast samsung gen4, meanwhile i'll be putting that saving into the GPU.SSD for a decent experience was years ago. Arkham Knight as an example from 2015. It's not about it being a requirement, it's about how the game plays with the benefit of better hardware. For £40 or so extra on the mobo, I don't see it being worth the chance. There's already a number of people who were talking about the benefit of board support through AM4 generation and already they've swapped out boards.
I didn't say it wasn't.SSD for a decent experience was years ago. Arkham Knight as an example from 2015.
Gen 3 - Higher end is something like 3,500mb/s r and 2,500mb/s w
Gen 4 - Current is around 5000mb/s r and 4400mb/s w
Next Gen consoles - Reported to be around 5500mb/s r
Gen 4 future is even quicker 6000+ mb/s r no issue
The new generation consoles can optimise specifically for these super fast SSDs - there will be nothing slower supported for primary storage. In the case of PC, you can't specifically require NVMe as a minimum requirement without alienating a large proportion of the platform's users
so if you think they don't alienate owner on old storage drives you may be surprised
Steam hardware surveys say otherwise
You hit the nail on its head. PS5 is a significant piece of hardware. I think it’s retail is set at $599, for that price you will not be able to pull together an 8c RTX5700 nvme Drive gaming PC. And that hardware would have been tuned for performance.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the PS5 and SX represent the first time in gaming history where a console release represents a significant performance jump over the average gaming PC? We are setting new precedents here. In all other console releases, PC gamers were already ahead of the curve - now they find themselves behind the curve for the first time ever. Because of this we can now longer use historical data as a predictor of future outcomes - new rules require new thinking.