The master plan is still tick, tock, isn't it? On a new node they might not want to also have too many changes to the arch.AMD's own roadmap showed Zen 4 to be on a 5nm process, so not just a refreshed Zen 3?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The master plan is still tick, tock, isn't it? On a new node they might not want to also have too many changes to the arch.AMD's own roadmap showed Zen 4 to be on a 5nm process, so not just a refreshed Zen 3?
The master plan is still tick, tock, isn't it? On a new node they might not want to also have too many changes to the arch.
...which automatically makes it not just a refreshed Zen 3, surely?Maybe it's a die shrink
Still, this is what Zen 2 can do when not hampered by Intercore latency.
Any news on Zen 3's memory speed? Will it be sticking to 3200MHz?
Much need/advantage in buying say 3600MHz now if anticipating a zen 3 upgrade in the future?
That's damn good, do we have any solid indication on CCX size for Zen3 yet?
edit - I know the current rumour is 8, just wondering if it's been confirmed yet.
Also, do MSI tend to support their AMD boards well? Tempted by the X570 Tomahawk. No way in *hell* I'm going Asus again.
AMD said they would be single CCX, 8 is the assumption given the core counts remain the same. The X570 Tomahawk will support Zen 3, yes.
...which automatically makes it not just a refreshed Zen 3, surely?
DDR5 is rumoured to be coming in to Zen4 isn't it?
As per German outlet, HardwareLuxx, AMD is looking to increase the single-threaded performance of its upcoming Zen 3 processors by at least 20%. This gain will come from an increase of 15% in IPC while rest will be achieved by increasing the operating clocks.
The core counts are expected to stay the same, with the consumer CPUs maxing out at 16 and the server chips packing up to 64 cores. Furthermore, as already reported earlier, AMD will be ditching the CCX design and sticking to a single CCD or chiplet without any partitions. As such, the L3 cache will now be shared between the eight cores on a chiplet, resulting in a better cache hit rate. The rest will remain the same.
DDR5 is rumoured to be coming in to Zen4 isn't it?
As for Genoa, you can expect a higher core count than 64 (again, as reported earlier) and a new socket. Both the server and client platforms will see this change with the former migrating to SP5 and the latter to AM5. As such, a lot of new technologies are to be expected including DDR5, 6nm EUV process, PCIe 5 and support for Persistent Memory (NVDIMM-P) for the server side. At the same time though, AMD will stick with SMT 2 rather than SMT 4 as rumored earlier.
AMD Zen 3 Based EPYC Milan CPUs Up To 20% Faster Than Zen 2 Based EPYC Rome, Larger Cache & Faster Clocks
https://wccftech.com/amd-zen-3-epyc-milan-cpus-up-to-20-faster-than-zen-2-epyc-rome/
You forgot the extra +30% that comes from sheer wishful thinkingAs productivty benchmarks dont seem to be affected by CCX latency, this 20% increase must be purely down to other architectual improvements. So games may see the 20% IPC improvement as well as a further 15% for improved latency like we saw with the 3300x? So potentially a 35% increase in games?
As productivty benchmarks dont seem to be affected by CCX latency, this 20% increase must be purely down to other architectual improvements. So games may see the 20% IPC improvement as well as a further 15% for improved latency like we saw with the 3300x? So potentially a 35% increase in games?