• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 3 (5000 Series), rumored 17% IPC gain.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which was my point that had AMD brought some competition then Intel would have had to up core counts earlier so AMD certainly played their part in the stagnation era.

You do realise you need resources and money some task when you up against someone that has much more of it and established might be wrong but wasn't AMD on the brink ?

So they did brilliantly and now we are seeing much better increases per gen and prices because of it , same goes with Nvidia need AMD and intel to compete

Anyone in Intel's position would do the same with stagnation when you have weak competition
 
Last edited:
Any company would want to sit back and do nothing but rebrand old products over and over again if they could, including AMD.

But to blame AMD for Intel doing that is utterly ridiculous, that's an example of cognitive dissonance, Intel can do no wrong, so Intel's wrong doing must be the fault of AMD.
 
Any company would want to sit back and do nothing but rebrand old products over and over again if they could, including AMD.

But to blame AMD for Intel doing that is utterly ridiculous, that's an example of cognitive dissonance, Intel can do no wrong, so Intel's wrong doing must be the fault of AMD.
It is Dave like mentality, but fortunately such are the minority.
 
It is Dave like mentality, but fortunately such are the minority.
After an argument I managed to avoid escalating on Facebook recently, I'd suggest it's actually the majority. At the very least, pig-headed ignorance is rife and everywhere, combined with the self-entitled notion that social media gives you the right to post your drivel at every given opportunity.
 
After an argument I managed to avoid escalating on Facebook recently, I'd suggest it's actually the majority. At the very least, pig-headed ignorance is rife and everywhere, combined with the self-entitled notion that social media gives you the right to post your drivel at every given opportunity.
Not in this forum ( i think), there are couple troublemakers (3-4 of them), so when you take them out of the equation it is relative normal conversation here, nothing toxic.
 
This forum is a calm and reasoned oasis compared with social media.

Sociopaths and Narcissists are drawn to places like Twitter because they can virtue signal over people and bully them, they are still a minority in society but they are starting to spill over in to institutions, frankly its about time the sane majority grew a spine and called these people out for what they are.
 
Intel have never to my knowledge increased core for core prices by that level from one gen to the next despite having a larger lead over AMD for many years than what Zen 3 had over comet lake at the time.
Yeap, only with rocket lake. Which came after amd patented the whole "more money for less cores" technology. If they keep it up with zen 4 their 6core cpu will cost 450 euros
 
5600x cost 50% more than 3600x ?
It competed with the 3600, since there was no 5600. Names are what companies use to make you compare what they want to you to compare. Don't be a victim to marketing tricks. If their new 6 core is named 7950x and it costs 600€ will you be like "oh great, it's cheaper than the 5950x"? No, names are completely irrelevant.
 
And yet, now that there is a 5600 you have a fair and accurate comparison. Oh look, the 5600 launched at the same $199 as the 3600.
Yeap, now that there is a 5600 for the same msrp as the 3600, we now know without a shadow of a doubt that AMD is stagnating way worse than Intel ever did. It took them 3 freaking years to give us a 20% mt performance increase. That's as bad, probably worse than the famous intel stagnation era. But of course, no amd fan will admit it. Nope, theyll keep banging on intels stagnation when amd the last 2 years has proven it's way worse. Such a disgusting company
 
Yeap, now that there is a 5600 for the same msrp as the 3600, we now know without a shadow of a doubt that AMD is stagnating way worse than Intel ever did. It took them 3 freaking years to give us a 20% mt performance increase. That's as bad, probably worse than the famous intel stagnation era. But of course, no amd fan will admit it. Nope, theyll keep banging on intels stagnation when amd the last 2 years has proven it's way worse. Such a disgusting company
at them 3 years what was the peformance of MT from the competition ? maybe that contributed goes both ways ??
 
at them 3 years what was the peformance of MT from the competition ? maybe that contributed goes both ways ??
You mean back when intel stagnated? Almost double. 2600 to 4770k and 3770k to 6700k had a MT increase of 35 to 40% according to anandtech. AMD is stagnating If you know nowadays , there is a 44% increase between the 10400 and the 12400. Way bigger than the puny 20% amd offers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom