This is from PCgamer but the link takes you to the source
Hopefully the case, a little more or a little less either way possibly.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
This is from PCgamer but the link takes you to the source
I don't usually do this, but right now I want to point out how full of crap you are.
In the Intel thread you called me an idiot, because you claimed a September release of Zen3, and I questioned where you'd got that from.
You then said, "It's on AMD's Twitter, learn to Google." You kept on about September being the official release date.
Now you're saying "September-October at the earliest."
So hold on... why have you rowed back on the "official" September release date? That I was an "idiot" for questioning?
Maybe because it's YOU who can't read, or Google? Apology, perhaps? Or just admit you're clueless.
In fact nothing has changed. There was never any "information" in the first place.That was 2-3 weeks ago mate. Information changes. If we have Matisse 2 next month as some rumours flying around, more likely we will see Zen 3 early 2021.
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...hUKEwiF38inrLTpAhVLDWMBHSvoDUcQ4dUDCAw&uact=5In fact nothing has changed. There was never any "information" in the first place.
There was never an announcement on AMD's Twitter that said September.
You still can't point to one because it never happened.
And yes I'm cheesed off because you chewed me out when I asked you for a source the first time.
Yeh the 3000 series isnt bad for DAW work at all, but there is little point in me upgrading to something with 12 or 16 cores, if the latency issues are still there for the large core parts
For example:
https://www.scanproaudio.info/2019/...00x-dawbench-tested-3-is-it-the-magic-number/
The 3900X with its new dual chiplet design was the only model to not come away with a completely clean sheet, although given we have an extra die section to deal with, this might not prove to be a huge surprise. I would expect it to mature in much the same fashion as the other chips below it in the range have done over future iterations and no doubt looking forward to them fine-tuning this new design further.
You can't admit you're wrong, can you?
Can you please explain how
1) Nvidia has managed to build 820mm2 die at 7nm when you said 500mm2 is the absolute maximum TSMC can do.
2) Nvidia has managed to fit in 54 billion transistors, therby by destorying AMD's transistor density by 66%.
Where is the 820mm2 7nm Nvidia GPU? Nowhere.
Yes. Yet you excuse a 400W 826mm GPU that would cost tens of thousands due to low yields?did you like just skip the last 24 hours
Funny translation. Too little information to guess what is going on. But any performance increase is welcome, be it single or multi core.Apparently the leaker is well respected so can be trusted.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/gjo2ad/rumor_zen3_will_exceed_expectations_just_like/
did you like just skip the last 24 hours
FYI 826mm2 includes the 6 stacks of HBM ram!!!!!!!!
you sure, link to this info? If that's the case and the die is much smaller then it makes the transistor density even more impressive, amazing what they've achieved. Hope rdna2 can catch up
GV100 was marketed as "815mm2" but that included HBM also too.
Then its even more impressive than we thought this morning at the announcement, 54bill transistors in such a small die and the 63 billion transistor model is still coming, AMD has a lot of catching up to do.
Link to this please. I tried use Google, nada, maybe I am doing it wrong? You seem to have the knack of finding things that never existedGV100 was marketed as "815mm2" but that included HBM also too.
GV100 was marketed as "815mm2" but that included HBM also too.