Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD sell CPUs not coolers and besides reviewers will test these with top 360 AIOs.If you really believe that AMD would release a 6 core CPU called the '7600X' that reaches 90 Celsius or more under load, with a decent cooler, then I suppose you'll believe anything.
Not sure if it will happen, even a 5% VAT cut amounts to billions of pounds in tax revenue, so is apparently considered to be a 'nuclear option' by the powers that be.So a 7600x works out at £285 with the Vat cut, right?
I'm not quite sure what people were expecting, TSMC have up'd the price of it's silicon wafers and everything is more expensive to produce so maintaining margins is difficult. You say the price isn't decent but consider that a Ryzen 7600X is going to cost $300 and in games it's giving you the equivalent or better gaming performance then the Intel 12900K which is twice the price.AMD claims that supply will be decent for Zen 4, but apparently not so high that they can afford a decent price cut on launch. TSMC 5nm EUV fab process chips are probably quite expensive to produce though, tbf.
Ryzen 7600X is going to cost $300 and in games it's giving you the equivalent or better gaming performance then the Intel 12900K which is twice the price
Is it better gaming performance than a 5800X3D though which can be dropped into a 50 quid board and some cheap 50 quid DDR4, to me it looks like an expensive side grade at best for anyone whose looking for a gaming only set up while if you game and do some productivity a 12600k should still offer a better mix of both for a lot less cash while the 13600k should pull ahead even more.I'm not quite sure what people were expecting, TSMC have up'd the price of it's silicon wafers and everything is more expensive to produce so maintaining margins is difficult. You say the price isn't decent but consider that a Ryzen 7600X is going to cost $300 and in games it's giving you the equivalent or better gaming performance then the Intel 12900K which is twice the price.
Which makes perfect sense if money is an issue and you are on a tight budget. If you have more to spend though you may as well go 7600X and a B650 board with some DDR5 and have guaranteed drop in upgrades for a few years yet.Is it better gaming performance than a 5800X3D though which can be dropped into a 50 quid board and some cheap 50 quid DDR4, to me it looks like an expensive side grade at best for anyone whose looking for a gaming only set up while if you game and do some productivity a 12600k should still offer a better mix of both for a lot less cash while the 13600k should pull ahead even more.
If you have more money to spend then wait for the Zen 4 Vcache to drop, the 7600X makes little sense in any scenario at its current price point.Which makes perfect sense if money is an issue and you are on a tight budget. If you have more to spend though you may as well go 7600X and a B650 board with some DDR5 and have guaranteed drop in upgrades for a few years yet.
On a side note if Zen 3 and Zen 4 is such a crappy platform and you clearly do not like it why keep chipping away in AMD threads???
I didn't realise Vcache pricing has been announced already... for all we know AMD could release a full range of SKUs with Vcache for a not to dissimilar price than the current line up.@Joxeon - The 8 core Vcache CPU will cost at least £500. Simply not affordable for many, some would prefer to save some of that cash for a Zen 5 upgrade later.
Vcache's main benefit, will be in offering higher minimum framerates, above 60 FPS (modern CPUs can already handle ~60fps minimums).