Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Demand's definitely super-high. I think people with patience to wait 2 weeks or so are gonna have a much better time in general with it than those that just want it "now!now!now!".I can't say I've experienced a CPU launch before but dang I'm just trying give companies my money and places are out of stock. Didn't get my order dispatched because Gigabyte sent barely any motherboards to OcUK? - ( Or is demand just that high? )
Still I'm pretty desperate - might get Saturday shipping with a different motherboard.![]()
Demand's definitely super-high. I think people with patience to wait 2 weeks or so are gonna have a much better time in general with it than those that just want it "now!now!now!".
I know! I looked at the comments and saw that as well. Even then though there's a massive variance between gaming performance for many reviewers.
So far Joker is the only one to just run the games with Afterburner overlay and let people look at the raw numbers themselves. I agree entirely though that AMD should have clarified about the Windows Drivers, and other micro code updates that still need to come.
Although if you ask me they should have waiting another month for the majority of those to be out and fixed before launching. It looks horrible for them, and hurt their market share price.
Down 7.12% is massive, and market even opened with a peak of $14.78, and just closed at $13.885.
That hurts them, and sends another bad message to short and medium term investors. It stung me, a little small fry. I can only imagine what it did to real players.
All of which could have been avoided by either informing reviewers about the missing updates, or just delaying the launch by another month. The latter might have boosted and kept them over $15, and then clenched it as the new minimum when Ryzen launched and did well not only on Workstation tasks but also gaming.
So close, and then fumbled right at the finishing line. Now they're stuck with this bruise, and what'll obviously be another "AMD sucks for gaming" circlejerk; while ignoring that the 1800X is still competing with the 5960X and 6900K at half the price.
Some reviewers even have the 1700@ 3.9Ghz on air cooler barely behind the 7700K @5Ghz.
Ryzen has amazing potential, and AMD just needs to sort out their launches.
OCUK haven't received their shipment of Gigabyte motherboards AFAIKI can't say I've experienced a CPU launch before but dang I'm just trying give companies my money and places are out of stock. Didn't get my order dispatched because Gigabyte sent barely any motherboards to OcUK? - ( Or is demand just that high? )
Still I'm pretty desperate - might get Saturday shipping with a different motherboard.![]()
When will be see the quad / hex core cpus
Yep,and the only reason I am going on about it is since I do want AMD to do well with this instead of stumbling like this during launches.
Yep,and the only reason I am going on about it is since I do want AMD to do well with this instead of stumbling like this during launches.
Although if you ask me they should have waiting another month for the majority of those to be out and fixed before launching. It looks horrible for them, and hurt their market share price.
Down 7.12% is massive, and market even opened with a peak of $14.78, and just closed at $13.885.
That hurts them, and sends another bad message to short and medium term investors. It stung me, a little small fry. I can only imagine what it did to real players.
All of which could have been avoided by either informing reviewers about the missing updates, or just delaying the launch by another month. The latter might have boosted and kept them over $15, and then clenched it as the new minimum when Ryzen launched and did well not only on Workstation tasks but also gaming.
It doesn't have boost clock issues, it runs 3.7ghz on all cores out the box, with xfr on it runs 4.1 on 1 core.Don't write such things, especially when clearly are out there reviews showing that 8/16 works fine in many games.
TW Warhammer has clearly an issue, because it dumps all the process to the last thread found, but not the rest.
1800X looks like it has boost clock issues, because manually overclocked at 3.9 performs better than left to it's own boost clock!
Hence also the 1700 OCed at 3.9 performs better than the 1800X, keeping up with the more expensive 7700K at overclock 5Ghz!!!!!!!!
The only people it would have stung were people that bought shares today at peak prices, everyone else is fine. It'll recover no doubts. Like I said earlier, it did the same with RX480 launch. But it has dropped because you and others panicked and sold. Are you in the camp that thought you were going to make a quick buck from an initial product launch, with all the hype surrounding it?
I got in well before that at least, but I expected AMD to have a decent launch for once without pit falls. Sadly they launched early and hit that snag with gaming consumers. Overall I'm still in the green by 2/3.
I hope people wake up and realise Ryzen is doing great where AMD really needs it to; and that's the enterprise market.
Near Broadwell performance, at half the cost, and less power. Still in for the medium haul.
No worries then, relax!
Yes.Is it just clockspeed that differentiates the 1700X and the 1800X?