I happen to agree that Ryzen is the better chip (and the way forward), but the premise of this video seems wrong to me. It's simple maths.
2500 100fps -> 100%
FX 90fps -> 90%
10 percent gap. And then you add a new chip which exceeds performance of the original top performer, and becomes 100%.
new 120fps -> 100%
2500 100fps -> 83%
FX 90fps -> 75%
Even though nothing about the original has changed ... eight percent gap. Even though nothing about the original results has changed. All that has changed is the baseline result (the '100%') has slid over a little, widening the data set, thereby squishing the 'percentage of base result' readings.
Am I missing something, or is everybody just overlooking this?