• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** AMD "Zen" thread (inc AM4/APU discussion) ***

Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,595
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
So there is some report up about Meltdown/Spectre like vulnerabilities in Ryzen chips.... except it's dodgy as hell.

A site called AMDflaws.com, with no ownership information, who put up a youtube video with comments disabled, a site that is a couple of weeks old, based in Israel (a strong Intel area with Intel investing billions there) have published a report about supposed Spectre like vulnerabilities. In these situations the standard industry procedure is to wait at least 90 days between telling a company about security risks and disclosing them publicly, Spectre/Meltdown was given closer to 7-8 months, this site published this report 24 hours after giving it to AMD.

On the idea that it's 'Spectre like' which is a hardware vulnerability that can't be fully fixed and could be exploited via things like Javascript in a browser, these potential vulnerabilities even under their suggestion is something that requires a bios flash on site to take advantage of so it's not anywhere near the same level of vulnerability as Spectre/Meltdown, not even close.

That this comes from 'Intel country', on a dodgy website with no names involved, standard security procedure completely ignored, this all screams of fake of rehashing the explained vulnerabilities in the security chip that have been previously patched in a more dramatic way. The thing to me is this sounds like way way too late to fight back against Meltdown/Spectre, is something new coming to hit Intel shortly and this is a Intel hatchet job trying to lessen another massive security hit they are going to take shortly?

Everything about this story screams hatchet job.

The site AMDflaws.com was made to publish this because no one and certainly none of the official people monitoring all this stuff have taken it seriously.

AMDflaws.com (lol) is hosted by GoDaddy, the domain owner is private and the domain IP behind a proxy, this one: https://www.domainsbyproxy.com/default.aspx

https://uk.godaddy.com/whois/result...6WpQqui456eW_PByYbMvtzKkmeqD90WvzxRsqrIAW_MF0

If you're a serious entity (not that you are with a name like that) why hide where and who you are?

Good grief this is desperate stuff. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,595
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
The site AMDflaws.com was made to publish this because no one and certainly none of the official people monitoring all this stuff have taken it seriously.

AMDflaws.com (lol) is hosted by GoDaddy, the domain owner is private and the domain IP behind a proxy, this one: https://www.domainsbyproxy.com/default.aspx

https://uk.godaddy.com/whois/result...6WpQqui456eW_PByYbMvtzKkmeqD90WvzxRsqrIAW_MF0

If you're a serious entity (not that you are with a name like that) why hide where and who you are?

Good grief this is desperate stuff. :rolleyes:

Oh, wait, name is private, address is not.

Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Registration Private
Admin Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Admin Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Admin Street: 14455 N. Hayden Road
Admin City: Scottsdale
Admin State/Province: Arizona
Admin Postal Code: 85260
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.4806242599

They have a Walmart up the road, And some tumble week growing in front of their nice magnolia wall, very swanky :D



https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place...0a28bc3ee3eed!8m2!3d33.6160293!4d-111.8926303

Completely fake.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Posts
6,847
2600 and 2700x look pretty meh to me..
How come? It looks like they've solved one of the two major shortcomings of Summit Ridge (RAM compatibility at higher speeds) and partially solved the other (clock speed deficiency compared to Intel). They are also still competitively priced compared to Intel's equivalent offerings: R5 2600 @ ~£170; R5 2600X & i5-8600K @ ~£215; R7 2700 & i7-8700 @ ~£270; R7 2700X @ ~£320; i7-8700K @ £360.

I imagine the i5-8600K will still be the go-to CPU for high frame rate 1080p gaming, but the R5 2600 will likely be a cheaper alternative and better all-rounder, whilst the R5 2600X will get closer in per-core performance whilst retaining the SMT advantage.
 
Back
Top Bottom