• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen3 event thread

We're now in a situation where buying the 2 lower SKUs your not getting a increase at all and maybe even a loss in multi core performance at those price points from the previous gen.
 
£400 (incl. VAT)
£260 (incl. VAT)
£300 (incl. VAT)
£165 (incl. VAT)
£260 (incl. VAT)
£120 (incl. VAT)
FREE DELIVERY
So who is considering buying a 5600X at £300 then?

Anybody?

no one, but I imagine there will be some who consider it at £289.99 :)


Whether the IPC increase, 100mhz boost and 30w lower TDP are worth the extra to you is irrelevant - for some it will be
 
I've not done thorough market research, but by looking at the best selling CPU charts on a certain internet retailer I get the impression £290 is more than most people are willing to pay for a CPU? It seems the majority of people aim for something in the £200 or less bracket. I think that might be the central cause of the annoyance, the cheapest CPU of the new lineup is a decent amount more that most people would spend on a CPU.
Hopefully the 5600x will be the best performing CPU at that price point on release. I was hoping the launch would have something in ~£200 price bracket for me but I can just about stretch to £290.
 
Are you being sarcastic?
Of all Zen 3 processors, 5600X is the most tempting one.
Faster than 3800X in multicore/productivity
Faster than 10900K in gaming and single core. Probably within a shout from top Zen3 too.
And all that in 65W.
Wait, +19% IPC but -25% cores makes it faster in multicore/productivity?

Think I'll wait for benchmarks before drinking that particular Koolaid... heh.
 
I've not done thorough market research, but by looking at the best selling CPU charts on a certain internet retailer I get the impression £290 is more than most people are willing to pay for a CPU? It seems the majority of people aim for something in the £200 or less bracket. I think that might be the central cause of the annoyance, the cheapest CPU of the new lineup is a decent amount more that most people would spend on a CPU.
Hopefully the 5600x will be the best performing CPU at that price point on release. I was hoping the launch would have something in ~£200 price bracket for me but I can just about stretch to £290.

Yeah, there's a reason the R5 3600 was so popular. However, this forum is definitely the 1% of PC hardware users and will see a skew towards the 5800X and the 5900X.
 
I've not done thorough market research, but by looking at the best selling CPU charts on a certain internet retailer I get the impression £290 is more than most people are willing to pay for a CPU? It seems the majority of people aim for something in the £200 or less bracket.

Look at the Steam Surveys - the majority of PC gamers have Quad cores, with a substantial amount of people with only Dual cores (e.g. I3's)
 
Wait, +19% IPC but -25% cores makes it faster in multicore/productivity?

Think I'll wait for benchmarks before drinking that particular Koolaid... heh.

Its not that far fetched if 3600 performs basically the same as 2700x which from my testing it does.
 
no one, but I imagine there will be some who consider it at £289.99 :)

Whether the IPC increase, 100mhz boost and 30w lower TDP are worth the extra to you is irrelevant - for some it will be
Don't know if you noticed but it was a question... I was asking if anyone here was looking to spend £300 on a 5600X.
 
Don't know if you noticed but it was a question... I was asking if anyone here was looking to spend £300 on a 5600X.

Ill probably buy one to replace the 3600 in the wifes machine, not on launch ill wait until the dust/prices settle down a bit and until her b450 gets an update.
 
3600 matches 2700X in multicore. Same thing.
You didn't say "matches", you said "faster". They don't mean the same thing.

You just said the 5600X would be "faster" in multicore/productivity than a 3800X.
Are you being sarcastic?
Of all Zen 3 processors, 5600X is the most tempting one.
Faster than 3800X in multicore/productivity
Faster than 10900K in gaming and single core. Probably within a shout from top Zen3 too.
And all that in 65W.
 
You didn't say "matches", you said "faster". They don't mean the same thing.

You just said the 5600X would be "faster" in multicore/productivity than a 3800X.

I recon it will match it multi core but be faster in gaming a bit like the 3600 vs 2700x. So overall the 5600x will come out the slightly faster chip across all workloads.
 
You didn't say "matches", you said "faster". They don't mean the same thing.
You just said the 5600X would be "faster" in multicore/productivity than a 3800X.
Yes, I expect so, because IPC gain is higher this time.

We know VERY little about 5600X performance, the only slide compared it to 10600K and showed
13% faster in games
19% faster in single thread
20% faster in multicore.
 
The 5600X should destroy the 3700X in both single and multi. So it's actually more performance for less money considering the 3700X launched at £329.99. The fact the 3700X has dropped since launch is irrelevant.
 
The 5600X should destroy the 3700X in both single and multi. So it's actually more performance for less money considering the 3700X launched at £329.99. The fact the 3700X has dropped since launch is irrelevant.
It won't win in multi core workloads just like the 5800X won't beat the now cheaper 3900X in multi core.

Hense a regression in multi core performance per $.

Also if these chips don't beat an overclocked 10600k in games then AMD will look like clowns.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom