If it was me, I’d pick Ruud. It’s too cruel bringing Ole back. The guy would be an emotional wreck if he didn’t get it full-time again.
Poll: AmorIn or AmorOut?
- Thread starter Robbo
- Start date
And? That doesn’t change fact your stadium is ran down, club itself is in turmoil it’s ran like crapHave a read our kid
What’s your point of this list? Utd have spent billions on players still all over place despite 10 managers
If you think Utd are perceived as a top club or up there with Madrid and Barca from a perception point of view your deluded.
There are many clubs excluding Barca and Madrid that are ran far better and more likely to win things over a longer period than Utd are right now.
Man Utd are a rich club despite debt, and are known all over the world.
They are not however a top, well ran club and haven’t been for years
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 19,676
- Location
- LU7
That's a fair evaluation from Reddy. It can be fixed but really needs a billionaire to buy the Glazers and Ineos out. Not a group of people, one person who would then appoint staff to run the sporting side and leave it to them. Anyone know any such billionaires?
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,763
Ole, just for Adam. I've missed his positivity this season.
Your missing the entire point so enjoy your delusion.Leave the fake news to Donald Trump pal .... the data don't lie
I’m not disputing Utd money. if you think your up there from a playing point of view and you as well ran as ourselves and city your to be frank an idiot.
You value means nothing when the club is run as badly as it is
Isn't it Fletcher?
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,763
No idea what club you support? Real Madrid?
Why are you calling me an idiot?
We are 2nd biggest in world and 6th in Prem?
The math aint mathing
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,763
Yeah Fletch
Liverpool.
I think I’ve been clear on my point and your only answer is look at this list which isn’t anything I’ve disputed or anyone in this thread
I apologise for the name calling
Last edited:
The money, global support and general club size isn't in question - but yes, there are deeply flawed aspects of the club that need to be fixed. I think INEOS are on the right track but they've made a complete bodge of the managerial situation (and the DoF with Ashworth).
I don't want Fletcher. I've never been keen on him, although he was a good player obviously. I think he's just interim for the Burnley game, and perhaps Brighton at the weekend too. As it stands, anyway.
Ole could be interesting and would help stabilise things until the summer. I actually think he did a pretty good job (in hindsight) and it was derailed by Sancho being an idiot and Ronaldo being a bad decision.
You know what, I'd happily give Southgate a go just as an interim. He's dull but he's used to dealing with the kind of drama this club attracts, the press love him and he would settle everything down and just use the players in a logical way. It would be quite interesting.
I don't want Fletcher. I've never been keen on him, although he was a good player obviously. I think he's just interim for the Burnley game, and perhaps Brighton at the weekend too. As it stands, anyway.
Ole could be interesting and would help stabilise things until the summer. I actually think he did a pretty good job (in hindsight) and it was derailed by Sancho being an idiot and Ronaldo being a bad decision.
You know what, I'd happily give Southgate a go just as an interim. He's dull but he's used to dealing with the kind of drama this club attracts, the press love him and he would settle everything down and just use the players in a logical way. It would be quite interesting.
Only for a few games. They’re getting a ‘proper’ interim supposedly.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,763
The usual cut & paste
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,763
Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 78,202
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
Nothing has changed.
The fans won't have Southgate. It's been floated enough and the response is terrible. It's not a progressive appointment.
My money is that Fletcher does two games max and they bring in Carrick to head it up with him as number 2. That makes the most sense as an interim appointment. Carrick has nothing to lose by doing this and it offers a degree of continuity.
Fletcher is a good guy, he knows quite a lot about the club and how it operates. I think he can be political which Ruben couldn't. Ole couldn't say no but I think he was so hurt the last time that he wouldn't want it permanently. He's not the right guy to challenge at the top level. Elite teams are not run on vibes and counter attack.
De Zerbi is an option. Premier League expereince but not exactly killing it at Marseille. Much more likely you get Carrick and Fletcher and then go for a perma manager in the summer - presumably after the world cup.
Glasner is going to leave Palace but I suspect not until the summer.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,763
Not really as your club keeps delivering entertainment for the rest of us and pain for youNo probs boss.
That Slabhead goal must have stung a bit?
I’m not sure if it would work but do Utd fans still actively protest against the owners etc? If not should they be doing?
I’m not sure ineos are your savers infact outside in I think you need a full buyout by some body and clubs restructured entirely who that person would be I’ve no idea.
I remember our protest to get hicks and gillet out but the ownership wasn’t done in same model of Utd with the whole stock exchange unsure if that impacts buying etc
Last edited:
Don't see why Carrick would come when he's doing such a good job at Middlesbrough. He's his own man and I'm sure would rather have his own success elsewhere.
Last edited: