Yea..your right..clearly Hamilton has no skill in a massively complicated/ physical F1 car that no one else has been able to replicate.Yes but his wins comes from his skill and not his Mercedes snooker cue.
Yea..your right..clearly Hamilton has no skill in a massively complicated/ physical F1 car that no one else has been able to replicate.Yes but his wins comes from his skill and not his Mercedes snooker cue.
Yes but he may have came back for a third time.
Yea..your right..clearly Hamilton has no skill in a massively complicated/ physical F1 car that no one else has been able to replicate.
At least Ronnie’s not a dirty tax dodger
Source?And he probably still ends up paying less tax than Lewis!
Lewis needs to work on his tax dodging skills, he is doing a terrible job of it seeing as he is in the top 5000 tax payers in the UK. Needs to find a better accountant.
Source?
Hamilton, who lives in Monaco, has faced scrutiny in the past over his tax arrangements, but has previously defended himself against criticism by saying that he pays "a lot" of tax in the UK.
On Hamilton's tax status, Richards wrote that Hamilton "is subject to withholding tax at source [being taxed at source] in nine countries around the world and files tax returns in four of the nine countries" and added that HM Revenue and Customs' 2019 figures put him "within the top 5,000 highest UK income tax payers".
Richards added: "It would therefore be totally wrong for the UK to deny Lewis an award befitting his historic achievements because of where he chooses to live or work or because his tax status has been misunderstood."
Source
Lord Hain, who serves on the All Party Parliamentary Group for F1, has researched the claim that Hamilton — despite living in Monaco — is among the UK's 5,000 biggest taxpayers. He contributes lavishly to the exchequer while working in Britain, where his Mercedes team are based.
source
80's-90's were pretty much peak F1 where driver skills could actually make up for deficits in cars. George Russell's race in the Mercedes is a prime example of how the bias is. He went from back of the grid to basically winning a race in a car he has never used. Hamilton would never be on 7 championships if he stayed at Mclaren. Likewise if Vettel wasn't at Redbull we would have been looking at Mark Webber as a multiple world champion. Jenson Button went from back of the grid to dominating and winning a championship with Brawn.
Err what?...hes been a test driver for them and has driven that car many times outside a race situation..what ar eyou talking about?A snooker player is basically 99% down to the person. Whereas F1 is the other way around and the percentage has gotten smaller and smaller as the years go on. 80's-90's were pretty much peak F1 where driver skills could actually make up for deficits in cars. George Russell's race in the Mercedes is a prime example of how the bias is. He went from back of the grid to basically winning a race in a car he has never used. Hamilton would never be on 7 championships if he stayed at Mclaren. Likewise if Vettel wasn't at Redbull we would have been looking at Mark Webber as a multiple world champion. Jenson Button went from back of the grid to dominating and winning a championship with Brawn.
Schumacher was exactly the same although his skill of what he did at Benneton and going to a rubbish Ferrari and making them kings was a great to see but he needed Ross Brawn and Rory Byrne to make that happen.
You will never see the likes of that again either as the manufacturers have their hands tied behind their backs they basically have one chance to get the regulations right and if they blow it up they are buggered for the next decade.
Like my other favourite pass time Manchester United. Everyone heralds Sir Alex Fergusson and not the players that played for him for the success they had over 25 years. Lewis is just a cog in a massive machine now. If anyone wants to be given plaudits it is Toto Wolff and his management of the team as Mercedes have been second to none for near enough the past decade.
Err what?...hes been a test driver for them and has driven that car many times outside a race situation..what ar eyou talking about?
Being in the right car the right time is ALWAYS been F1 since its inception, a big differance was Hamilton moved to the Merc Works team and everyone laughed.
The whole "teams have teh car for a decade thing" is rubbish as well.
Just as well ROnnie doesnt have to work in a team eh?...his craptastic attitude even towards his own sprt and fellow players drag the whole thing down.
No doubt that the car is a big part of it, but that’s the difference with F1 and a sport like snooker or darts where you’re the main factor in success.Yes but his wins comes from his skill and not his Mercedes snooker cue.
No doubt that the car is a big part of it, but that’s the difference with F1 and a sport like snooker or darts where you’re the main factor in success.
If it were truly all-car then Bottas would be consistently finishing 2nd and challenging Lewis more than he does.
Err what?...hes been a test driver for them and has driven that car many times outside a race situation..what ar eyou talking about?
Being in the right car the right time is ALWAYS been F1 since its inception, a big differance was Hamilton moved to the Merc Works team and everyone laughed.
The whole "teams have teh car for a decade thing" is rubbish as well.
Just as well ROnnie doesnt have to work in a team eh?...his craptastic attitude even towards his own sprt and fellow players drag the whole thing down.
I think that is the reason why 2016 was at least a little entertaining as was 2010 between Vettel and Webber because in reality you are only watching two cars battle it out for the championship. Alonso only really caught up because the two were battling it out.
He's been a test driver in the past but races for Williams now. He had to have his shoes cut up just to fit in the car. How easily he raced just goes to show how beastly the car is. Being in the right car has been true but in the past there has been two right cars or maybe even three in the 80's. Since 2009 there has realistically only been one right car. Senna, Prost and Schumacher won titles in the second best car. I would also argue Raikonnen in 2007.
Not "int the past" hes tested that exact Merc a few times now, an dyo uknow the fact that Toto is his manager doesnt hurt things as many have always said hes one of the most talented drivers.
It's been common knowledge for a while....
But still, beat him with the tax dodging stick all you like as long as the same energy is kept for the other British F1 drivers who do the same (Stewart, Button, Coulthard and Mansell)
Button never dodged tax.i thought he stayed in UK paid it all.It's been common knowledge for a while....
But still, beat him with the tax dodging stick all you like as long as the same energy is kept for the other British F1 drivers who do the same (Stewart, Button, Coulthard and Mansell)
Button never dodged tax.i thought he stayed in UK paid it all.
Ronnie should never win a spoty - he's got a massive chip on his shoulder and has no empathy. He has a personality alright - just not an aspiring one you'd want your kids to follow.
Button never dodged tax.i thought he stayed in UK paid it all.
Since 2009 there has realistically only been one right car. Senna, Prost and Schumacher won titles in the second best car. I would also argue Raikonnen in 2007.
Hamilton in 2008? He is the last person to win a WDC without the Team winning WCC. Kimi only won due to Lewis and Fernando fighting one another. Really he should've been a WDC with Mclaren much earlier.
I don't actually think his 2007 championship was that special.