• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Another RTX GPU Moan Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
Yet you still brought 2x 20xx cards on a promise, and in good faith from Nvidia.
You still hang on to SLI in the hope it will be supported in games and by Nvidia.
People only use the words: Wish, Hope, faith belief and trust, as a last desperate resort, when they have nothing else left.
You are in a tiny, niche market. I hope you get what you wish for.

I bought the 2080 Ti cards as I wanted to try out the new Turing cards, words like Wish, Hope, faith belief and trust don't even factor into it.

I already have other gaming options that are faster than Turing.
 
I bought the 2080 Ti cards as I wanted to try out the new Turing cards, words like Wish, Hope, faith belief and trust don't even factor into it.

I already have other gaming options that are faster than Turing.
And its your money, you do what you like with it, if it gives you pleasure. I do.
 
indeed, haha 8 gig isnt enough for ff15 at 720p ;)

Its dangerous to make claims like "vram isnt needed" based on the very few games reviewers cherry pick.
But to be fair he is somewhat right as at least 99% of games ever made won't ever go over it. But there are definitely some games out there that do and obviously going forward there will be even more.
 
Insanely weird sidegrade

Going from a dead RTX 2080Ti to 2x GTX 1080Ti's is definitely an upgrade !. My RTX 2080Ti gave up life after 4 days
->

and hello to the SLi ones :p
I have run SLi permanently in all my systems since 2006. The number of SLi game related issues I've had can be counted on one hand.

Does seem a bit odd doubling down on two overpriced 1080 Tis with poorly supported SLI when a 2080 Ti can be had for <£1000 now.
I sold 2x Zotac GTX 1080Ti F.E cards to get RTX 2080Ti and get better performance in games than don't support SLi. My RTX 2080Ti lasted 4 days, and after reading about multiple failures etc I didn't feel comfortable getting another one that would have 50/50 risk of dying within a week.
My wife has been through her 2nd RMA of MSI RTX 2080 Duke card. We have now had the same number of RMA's (3) on graphics cards, that we have had over the past 20years having had about 175 cards through the hands.
I got my money refunded and bough two GTX 1080Ti's on sale (cheaper than RTX 2080), because I know what I would get and could expect again. I am not going for RTX cards before the fault is identified, and probably not going for them before we see a 2nd iteration of the card. Pretty dissappointed with the Ray Tracing performance and effect overall.
 
Last edited:
Going from a dead RTX 2080Ti to 2x GTX 1080Ti's is definitely an upgrade !. My RTX 2080Ti gave up life after 4 days
->


I have run SLi permanently in all my systems since 2006. The number of SLi game related issues I've had can be counted on one hand.


I sold 2x Zotac GTX 1080Ti F.E cards to get RTX 2080Ti and get better performance in games than don't support SLi. My RTX 2080Ti lasted 4 days, and after reading about multiple failures etc I didn't feel comfortable getting another one that would have 50/50 risk of dying within a week.
My wife has been through her 2nd RMA of MSI RTX 2080 Duke card. We have now had the same number of RMA's (3) on graphics cards, that we have had over the past 20years having had about 175 cards through the hands.
I got my money refunded and bough two GTX 1080Ti's on sale (cheaper than RTX 2080), because I know what I would get and could expect again. I am not going for RTX cards before the fault is identified, and probably not going for them before we see a 2nd iteration of the card. Pretty dissappointed with the Ray Tracing performance and effect overall.
That's pretty bad luck, even with the high failure rate :(
 
I have run SLi permanently in all my systems since 2006. The number of SLi game related issues I've had can be counted on one hand.
.
I would have believed that too until I ran 2x 1070 Ti's recently and in Sli the performance improvement was rubbish. This was using a 1950X however that some say does not work well with Sli. In Far Cry 5 and Prey 2016, the FPS gains were pretty minimal. I did get a bit more using only half the CPU but from memory FC5 was giving 22% more with Sli. Looking at some reviews it seemed all over the place whether you get any improvement in performance, none and all, or in some cases maybe even lose a bit
 
I would have believed that too until I ran 2x 1070 Ti's recently and in Sli the performance improvement was rubbish. This was using a 1950X however that some say does not work well with Sli. In Far Cry 5 and Prey 2016, the FPS gains were pretty minimal. I did get a bit more using only half the CPU but from memory FC5 was giving 22% more with Sli. Looking at some reviews it seemed all over the place whether you get any improvement in performance, none and all, or in some cases maybe even lose a bit
We don't know what games he plays. But my understanding is on majority of games released the past couple of years, there is little to no SLI support. I will never go multi gpu again. Been there done that, fun for a while, but single GPU is where it is at. It just works! :D

I would much rather have a 2080 Ti than two 1080 Ti's personally.
 
The same 99% of games also wont go over 4 gig tho ;)
True. There are like a handful of games as far as I know that go over 8gb in existence.

Don't get me wrong, I like having 12GB VRAM, at least I know I will never have VRAM issues. But also I am realistic and know only a few games make use of it up until now. Hopefully more will make use of it soon though, at 4K at least :)
 
...

I would much rather have a 2080 Ti than two 1080 Ti's personally.

That was also my original point of reference after selling my zotac 1080ti's. To get more performance in newer games that don't support SLi. But with the current situation of RTX series and 50/50 chances of getting a working one, I just didn't felt comfortable gambling once more with £1200.
Maybe with RTX 3000 series I'll ditch the SLi setup for good - assuming Turning works and has better RT performance that the current ones :)
 
That was also my original point of reference after selling my zotac 1080ti's. To get more performance in newer games that don't support SLi. But with the current situation of RTX series and 50/50 chances of getting a working one, I just didn't felt comfortable gambling once more with £1200.
Maybe with RTX 3000 series I'll ditch the SLi setup for good - assuming Turning works and has better RT performance that the current ones :)

Fair enough. Nvidia really had a poor launch this time. RTX is not as good as the videos they showed, hardly any games used it 3 months on, silly prices and the cherry on top many of them go pop. Lol.

I am looking forward to RTX 3000 series. Hopefully they manage to double the RT cores and devs learn to optimise their code better so I can play at 4K. Oh and hopefully there are more than a handful of games supporting it by then :D
 
What
I bought the 2080 Ti cards as I wanted to try out the new Turing cards, words like Wish, Hope, faith belief and trust don't even factor into it.

I already have other gaming options that are faster than Turing.

Would have been your breaking point price wise?
 
What


Would have been your breaking point price wise?

Don't know but I also bought a couple of Titan V cards when they launched.

Having said that NVidia should look at their pricing and what they offer for it as I think £500 should be the asking price for a normal top tier gaming card.

NVidia could have left out all the RTX and DLSS for Turing and would have then been able to produce a 2080 Ti for £500.

ATM NVidia are charging people to recoup the cost of developing and deploying tech that is only just feasible to use and I am not sure if most people want these features at the asking price.
 
Don't know but I also bought a couple of Titan V cards when they launched.

Having said that NVidia should look at their pricing and what they offer for it as I think £500 should be the asking price for a normal top tier gaming card.

NVidia could have left out all the RTX and DLSS for Turing and would have then been able to produce a 2080 Ti for £500.

ATM NVidia are charging people to recoup the cost of developing and deploying tech that is only just feasible to use and I am not sure if most people want these features at the asking price.

I think this hits the nail on the head really. They should have at least kept the same pricing structure
 
I agree with both of you.

There should have been a 2080 GTX and a a 2080 RTX, one without the added fluff, and one with it, let consumers choose.
They would never do that, makes no business sense if they are trying to push RTX. They need as big user base as possible to get devs to make games for it. If they did that it would just never take off.
 
I personally think RT is just another Physx. A handful of games before its forgotten.
Physx probably not gone away either it's probably now just fully integrated, part of the norm, or done differently/better.
RT or something that does the same thing is the future :). Eventually it'll not even be thought about - just done. To say it'll just die off is like saying we'll never have the effects/additional realism it provides.
One of the things I dislike about the 20 series is actually the RTX name :). Should have just stuck to GTX with RT capabilities, ie, an additional feature.
If NV released GTX cards alongside, few would buy RT due to the cost and it would never take off. In a few years we'll all be glad NV took this move.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom