Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 6,439
- Location
- SE England
I'll be honest, I didn't even notice the CPU specs. Not going to be doing much on that at all apart from web browsing and Office. I'm definitely out.
Thats just 1 example thou, a lot of the other Core-M units review shows similar subpar performance, and its too be expected these things only need 5W, normal phone chips can go up to 7W so its really amazing. But lets see what happens.
I'll be honest, I didn't even notice the CPU specs. Not going to be doing much on that at all apart from web browsing and Office. I'm definitely out.
But Air has an I5 CPU this has got some Core-M thing. Is it going to be powerful enough to do anything other than run office?
Reminds me of the time I bought the original Macbook Air for $1799 (the SSD option was $3499). At the time it had an 80GB iPod mini HD, 2GB of RAM, 4 hours of battery, and a crippled processor. People were fussing over it not having an optical drive built-in. The same way people are fussing over missing ports today.
Just a few years later, you got SSD standard, 4GB RAM standard, etc. and it's half the price.
My prediction is that in 2-3 years this will be the standard MacBook. People will have USB-C flash drives, use more wireless peripherals, and no one will think twice about getting a computer equipped with just USB-C. The same way no one is complaining about NOT a single "new" Apple computer having optical drives, not even their desktops.
I further predict that after another one or two generations of this hardware, the price will drop to $899 or $999 and it will "replace" the existing Air line the way the Pro's have all been replaced by the Retina ones (I am sure they will drop the "retina" moniker as soon as the final non-retina model is discontinued).
That's why they named it "MacBook" instead of adding a suffix, because that makes it easy to drop "Air" models and you're left with MacBook and MacBook Pro, just like the good ol' days.
In the mean time, I think it is a dream machine for internet entrepreneurs and digital nomads. Lighter than the 11" so even better for travel, without making a compromise on screen quality or battery life.
Not sure how it compares horsepower wise, but I am sure by Gen 2 or 3 the benchmarks will be adequate for most buyers.
Why didnt they put the new USB-C socket on the updated macbook pros, especially since they updated to the new touchpad? doesn't make sense to me.
I still think 1 port is stupid though, without buying the adapters you can't do anything. And even then. Only 1 port.Some guy on MacRumors - pretty much sums it up. Paying a premium for being an early adopter.
It was a joke, but after 5 minutes trying to figure out the colour to hide the 2nd bit of my post I gave up!!
rp2000