because ms have never aggressively used their patent portfolio. if they decide to, apple are screwed.
That's on the assumption that Apple aren't just paying license fees at the moment
because ms have never aggressively used their patent portfolio. if they decide to, apple are screwed.
???
I just Googled "Windows phone" and unless I'm missing something, I fail to see how it's 'very different'. To me it looks basically like most other smart phones - big screen, three buttons at the bottom for home, back, menu, or whatever.
Can you show me a picture of the one you have in mind?
EDIT: Are you referring to the physical design or the UI?
I would never buy an apple product, I hate the way they work and the ethos of the product.
???
I just Googled "Windows phone" and unless I'm missing something, I fail to see how it's 'very different'. To me it looks basically like most other smart phones - big screen, three buttons at the bottom for home, back, menu, or whatever.
Can you show me a picture of the one you have in mind?
EDIT: Are you referring to the physical design or the UI?
Hmmm, a jury verdict when the court is a hands throw from Apple HQ and the Jury loaded with silicon valley Gentiles who worship the Lord God Jobs......
Was it ever going to go another way. Each are as bad each other, Apple steal from Sony et al, Samsung steal from Apple.....evolution at work.![]()
The UI. MS put a lot of development time into differentiating themselves here. Have a read of this if you're interested.
http://gizmodo.com/5919952/windows-...t-start-screen-in-any-phone?tag=windowsphone8
I see.
In which case, surely the UI is a function of the Android OS, so why is Samsung the target? Why not all phones with an Andorid OS?
Picard is leg pic
How different can you make them though?
The reason they all look similar is because they are all touchscreens, so the extent of the design is basically - a screen.
But Microsoft surface is fantastic, it is something new. If they release it at the rumoured price they are going to destroy the iPad (which is just a big iPhone really).
This. I was an Apple fanatic during the 90s when it was the plucky upstart taking on the might of the Wintel behemoth - I had a Mac at home and would loudly proclaim its superiority over a Windows box at any given opportunity.
I guess it was the return of Steve Jobs that was the tipping point for me - he turned the company into the arrogant B.S. machine that is today. As a fanatic, you'd think I'd have been happy about that, but no - somewhere along the line he destroyed something in the ethos of the old Apple that I had found appealing. Maybe I just have an underdog mentality.
I really can't understand the hype around the iPhone - I used my sister-in-law's recently and I've got to say all bias aside I was completely underwhelmed. The screen was pathetically small and it was sluggish in use compared to my lowly Android. I don't like the whole 'Apple knows what's best for you' locked-down nature of iOS either - I'll decide how I want MY phone set up, not some Yank in Cupertino. If I want to rip out the factory-provided SMS module and replace them with something better, then I'll do so. The point being, I can change practically every facet of my Android, if I don't like how it works out of the box.
I'm due an upgrade towards the end of February and there are only two candidates on the shortlist - iOS and Android. Unless the iPhone 5 is something utterly revolutionary - not expecting it to be, as Apple seems content to sit on its laurels knowing that the herd will purchase whatever they put out, like the wet fart that was the 4S - my next phone will either be an SGS3 or the follow-up to the Galaxy Nexus if there's been a new one announced by then.
At least they shut up all the people that complain that Microsoft are not really innovative.![]()
Stealing IP is wrong