^ No it does not!!! I have very good 28nm GPU. I don't wanna bin again!!!
Does
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
^ No it does not!!! I have very good 28nm GPU. I don't wanna bin again!!!
Of course Nvidia have an answer, ridiculous to think otherwise tbh . They have been one step ahead each time AMD drop a GPU..
AMD dropped 7970, Nvidia answered with 680 plus
'Nvidia Titan'
then followed with 780 (Took the lead)
AMD answered with 290X
Nvidia followed with 780Ti / Titan Black. (Took the lead)
If AMD drop full fat Hawaii, Nvidia will answer for sure..
Agreed. GTX 790 (Maxwell) 28nm. Plus price drops on GTX 780 / 780 Ti.
If NVidia really want to compete they need to sell their cards at realistic price points.
Heck even the 384bit bus on the Titan Z is showing the strain @4K with the performance dropping right off compared to Hawaii cards.
We may be in for a bit of a disappointment in 20mn, just because its a smaller node does not automatically mean its this and that.
the fact that its a smaller node could bring its own problems, it may not clock as well as 28nm, it maybe be more difficult to cool because of its more compact nature....
Can't be much worse than cards running at 95c in any case
Pity none of the interviews lately with Richard Huddy asked him about thermals and what amd was going to do to do a better job with regards to heatsink designs and fan noise.
This would be more down to the lack of ROPS rather than the memory bandwidth. In the 295X2 vs Titan Z comparison the latter has more memory bandwidth (336GB/s vs 320GB/s).
The ROP throughput/Pixel fillrate on the titan Z is theoretically much lower than the 295X2.
~876Mhz x 48 = 42GB/s (x2)
~1000Mhz x 64 = 64GB/s (x2)
Back on topic the release of the "Full fat" 290XTX doesn't really change much at the top end. The 780TI will still end up (marginally) quicker in most review benchmarks, whilst user reviews / more in depth benchmarks will show rough parity across the top end cards (clocked up of course).
Overall, meh.
Goes both ways, the 7990 launched at a ridiculous price only to tumble to half its price later in the year. Just wondering how long before the 295x2 takes a dive in price.
The trouble with this post, is that if he had a dig at AMD you wouldn't mind at all because I have never seen you leap to the defence of thread when guys dig at AMD. And there is a few guys who constantly do.
It's pretty much slower than GTX780Ti at above 1920x1080 res guaranteed looking at those specs...How many ROPs is the new NVidia card said to have.
3,200 CUDA cores, TMU's: 200, ROPS: 32, Memory Bus: 256, Architecture: Maxwell.
This card is starting to look like an epic failure at high resolutions and oh that 256bit bus.
You are making my argument for me
How many ROPs is the new NVidia card said to have.
3,200 CUDA cores, TMU's: 200, ROPS: 32, Memory Bus: 256, Architecture: Maxwell.
This card is starting to look like an epic failure at high resolutions and oh that 256bit bus.
Until we see retail cards, this is all speculation on rumor. Nvidia certainly aren't stupid, whatever AMD release you can be sure Nvidia will respond and most likely with more performance albeit at a higher price.
Whatever comes next, 28nm really is getting long in the tooth...
Want full fat new architecture on 20nm node
*Cough* FX 5800 Ultra */Cough*
*Cough* FX 5800 Ultra */Cough*
Ha, if the worst thing is a GPU from 11 years ago I think Nvidia are pretty much on top of their game
The new GTX799 comes with Nvidia 3D vision glasses free of charge! and Nvidia 3D vision earplugs!