I have a bath once a week, have since i was a wee boy, showering every day can't be good for your immune system, and plus i just can't be arsed with it tbh.
I am interested in how you think cleaning yourself adversely affects you immune system. I thought that idea died out centuries ago (and it wasn't very common even then).
This has actually reminded me when I read the Horrible Histories books as a kid, reading how Queen Lizzy I used to be bathed once a month.
There's a lot of misunderstanding involved in that. For a start, the person commenting on it was surprised at how
often QE I bathed. The key point is
bathing. In those days, people didn't usually bathe to clean themself. It was seen as more of a medicinal thing (think along the lines of a spa, with mineral baths). The foreign dignitary commenting on QE I's bathing habits was essentially saying that she was a hypochondriac. However, most people in those days cleaned themselves at least daily. There are even extant late medieval and early renaissance books on etiquette and cleaning yourself features heavily in them. In QE I's time, people generally rubbed themselves vigorously with a rough dry towel and used soap and scented water to wash their hands and face and probably their armpits and groin. That's not directly referred to in the extant etiquette manuals because it would have been seen as hugely impolite to mention such things in those days. Hands were to be washed
frequently. Also common was bathing and/or swimming in moving water. It had to be moving - still water was seen as being unclean, impure and probably dangerous. People back then didn't understand the mechanisms of infections and infectious diseases, but they could make observations and they were well aware that unmoving water increased the risk of infection.
Can you imagine how anyone from the 21st century (maybe not the people featured in the OP article of course) would feel if they were sent back to the 16th?
Not very well, on the whole. I have tried the dry rubdown and wet cloth washing as an experiment and it does work...but not as well as detergent and running hot water. Also, I'd miss books, electric lighting, central heating, microwaves, freezers, computers and, most of all, medicine that actually works. But it wouldn't be as bad as many people think unless you went back to be a poor person in an urban environment. That was very grim indeed, though not as grim as it became later.
Here's a sobering fact. In the 18th and most of the 19th century, the death rate in London (and most if not all other cities) significantly exceeded the birth rate. The only reason cities grew or even maintained their existing size and population was due to migration into cities from the countryside. Most of the deaths were due to disease, although the murder rate was extremely high.
Ah yes, in college someone recommended this. Burning gonads are not a nice feeling
I tried it too. I suppose it does feel clean, but the burning sensation isn't appealing to me and I know it's no more effective at cleaning that any other shower gel with the same type of detergent (which almost all of them have). I use Sanex sensitive because I'm a delicate princess.
I shower twice a day, brush me teeth twice a day, I suppose I also wash my hair twice a day, but I have very little hair on my head now so it doesn't really count. I have a lot more hair on my body, but the usual shower gel works just fine on it. I changed my clothes twice a day too, since I wouldn't get out of the shower and into clothes I'd already worn. I change my bedding when I decide to, which is probably about twice a week on average. None of that is much fuss, nor does it take much time, nor is it expensive. So why wouldn't I do it?