• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ashes of the Singularity Coming, with DX12 Benchmark in thread.

bru said:
That's quite interesting, what sort of variance do you normally get from one run to the next, just so we know the margin of error. good improvement though.
Click to expand...

+-2 fps on cpu performance. +-1 fps on gpu. Even the test is non synthetic, you still get quite stable performance out of it.
 
Just got this, my results from 2500k @ 4.6 and a 980, default to whatever settings were default....



DX11
mRnldLu.png

DX12
bIpygpt.png

On first glance it appears to be quite a nice boost in DX12. :)
 
muziqaz said:
did they do non mixed ones anywhere?
980ti with titan x scaling seems quite bad compared to fury x and fury. wonder how 2x fury x does against 2x 980ti or 2x titans.


I must admit I was one of those who was completely sceptical about this technology working :D
Click to expand...

That's because it does not work lol.

If they can not get 2 GM200 cards to scale well all the other results are meaningless too.:D

The frametimes where nothing to be proud of either.
 
muziqaz said:
I must admit I was one of those who was completely sceptical about this technology working :D
Click to expand...

A lot easier to get that kind of tech working with top down type games where you have a fairly consistent make up of detail over every part of the screen (bar unit coverage).
 
Dygaza said:
I wonder how much lack of SLI bridges is hurting nvidia scaling. AMD ofc doesn't need those on newer cards.
Click to expand...

if nvidia side is hurting, amd would be bottlenecked by it as well when having AMD/nvidia cards in same system. AMD XDMA engine is just between AMD cards. If you pop in nvidia card with slow interconnect, AMD will be affected as well ;)
 
humbug said:
That is brilliant, stick a cheap used GPU along side your main GPU to give it a boost.

An old GTX 660 or 7870 along with my GTX 970 for a 20/30% boost.

This is the best thing since light bulbs!
Click to expand...

Not worried about increased frametime variation from using 2 cards with huge performance difference?
 
Dygaza said:
Not worried about increased frametime variation from using 2 cards with huge performance difference?
Click to expand...

Not with campaign type games no, i'm not, in that smoothness matters of course but i'm not that anal about it, what matters more to me with games like that is higher IQ and higher VSR Res, the extra muscle from a cheap GPU to boost the main will do that.

Its also early days, i'm sure Nvidia and AMD will smooth out the frame timings as time goes on.
 
humbug said:
Its also early days, i'm sure Nvidia and AMD will smooth out the frame timings as time goes on.
Click to expand...

I am sure there will be driver updates in the next few weeks to stop people using both brands together and one of the reasons that will be used to justify it is poor performance and frametimes.:eek:
 
humbug said:
Not with campaign type games no, i'm not, in that smoothness matters of course but i'm not that anal about it, what matters more to me with games like that is higher IQ and higher VSR Res, the extra muscle from a cheap GPU to boost the main will do that.

Its also early days, i'm sure Nvidia and AMD will smooth out the frame timings as time goes on.
Click to expand...

True, but I'm hoping for more SFR friendly approach for multiadapters ,when performance difference is bigger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom