Just pointing out the facts. We know from other recent threads that you don't like to deal with them.
Don't try facts and logic here, you need to mindlessly accept stuff like this... in this case it's "racist" to ask about someone's heritage. No explanation about why it's inherently racist to do so of course. At best, some people have focused on some analysis of something being presented as though it's a transcript but in reality, is a several-line recollection from memory of the interaction...
That recollection from memory just happens to contain the well-used trope "but where are you really from", she may have used that exact phrase, we don't know for sure, but sure, it's totally plausible she's asked about heritage in a way that has caused offense:
There's also the hair-touching trope, black women in the west apparently can be
very sensitive about hair, as multiple articles explained to us following this incident:
Why might the Lady in waiting be looking at the name badge (and apparently touching her hair in the process), well because she has an unusual name: She was born Marlene Headly but has since changed her name to Ngozi Fulani.
She's basically LARPing a little bit at this point;
Marlene Headly from Hackney went to Buckingham Place as
Ngozi Fulani, dressed like she's from Africa and people are wondering why she might have been asked about her heritage?
The black woman to the right of her in the photo isn't in anything resembling some sort of African national dress and is called
Caroline - did she get the same heritage questions? Could it possibly be that it's the name + costume which prompted the curiosity??? Being curious about heritage is not racist, asking about it in an awkward way may well be rude but that's about it.
Of course, she's since come out with disingenuous claims that she didn't want to name the person despite basically naming them anyway... is there some other motive? Well we know she loves publicity in her other disputes + apparently she's not a fan of the Royals anyway and has bought into "wokeness" (running a racially segregated women's shelter that's pretty much guaranteed).
She's already accused Charles and Camilla of domestic violence towards Megan (which seems completely unhinged):
Also, I wonder if Chris's comparison might not be too far off:
The woman, for some reasons, reminds me of Camila Batmanghelidjh. Another charity CEO that liked and hit the media. Then too many questions were asked for which she had no defining answers and her world and charitable status fell apart...
An apparent victim claimed she wasn't helped because of "privilege" + a claim that this woman is the only paid employee + racked up expenses... maybe just a bit of muck swinging tbh.. but I guess she's drawn lots of attention to herself now: