Asus Prime X370-Pro Owner's thread

Soldato
Joined
16 May 2005
Posts
6,509
Location
Cold waters
Got fed up of my Corsair LPX memory which the X370 hates, and replaced it with GSkill FlareX. Runs at 3200MHz 14-14-14-34 on auto-everything. Sometimes throwing money at a problem to make it go away isn't so bad! :)
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Feb 2009
Posts
9,978
Location
Not where I'd like to be
Got fed up of my Corsair LPX memory which the X370 hates, and replaced it with GSkill FlareX. Runs at 3200MHz 14-14-14-34 on auto-everything. Sometimes throwing money at a problem to make it go away isn't so bad! :)

Is it worth the extra cost? I currently have 16gb LPX running at 2933, and I cannot get it any higher, so would going to the G Skill at 3200 make a decent difference for me?
 
Soldato
Joined
16 May 2005
Posts
6,509
Location
Cold waters
Is it worth the extra cost? I currently have 16gb LPX running at 2933, and I cannot get it any higher, so would going to the G Skill at 3200 make a decent difference for me?
Probably not worth the money in the scheme of things, but it's nice to cure the geek anxiety of a system not running optimally...
 
Associate
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Posts
1,275
Location
Horsham
Is it worth the extra cost? I currently have 16gb LPX running at 2933, and I cannot get it any higher, so would going to the G Skill at 3200 make a decent difference for me?

I went from 2800MHz Corsair LPX to 3200MHz Flare X and don't regret it tbh.

Around £70 extra I paid which isn't value for money though
 
Associate
Joined
24 Aug 2017
Posts
32
How much would you have to overclock a 1600 to get higher scores than a 1600X cpu (not overclocked)?

Breaking point etc?

Also I would like to know results and breaking points for both single, dual and multi core performance.

The reason why I am asking this is that I suspect that the 1600X with XFR is more efficient and powerful than I initially thought.

XFR seem to do wonders to dynamic single and dual core performance? Also for the overall total score of pcu benchmarks? (depending on which one)

I am starting to doubt people saying 1600 is more value than 1600X. Maybe that's true if you overclock a 1600 really high, 4Ghz or even higher but otherwise, no? Considering you will achieve similar speeds with a stock 1600X which also will run more stable and quiet when not overclocked?

Single and dual core performance using high clock frequencies still matters?

From Tom's Hardware:
"Due to its identical clock rates, AMD's Ryzen 5 1600X demonstrates similar performance as the Ryzen 7 1800X in lightly-threaded content creation and productivity tests. The 1600X also outpaces the Ryzen 7 1700 in a great many scenarios where its higher frequency weighs heavier than its core count deficit. This makes the 1700 a tougher sell."

What do you guys say?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom