Associate
Can someone post some 100% screen shots pls? Looks like a nice little feature.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
ATI/AMD's new Morphological Anti-aliasing
- Thread starter ViRuS2k
- Start date
Soldato
I think people should try it for themselves before they judge & especially when looking at the blown up pics as even normal AA can look blurry when zoomed in.
I don't think its that bad. nVidia tried something similiar in 2000/2001 or so and ditched it mostly because people thought it too blurry - but back then most people ran without AA and at a lower res anyway so its a bit of a different ball game now.
Soldato
Indeed softening some edges can give that perception.
But if the comparison shots were not that some people would not notice.
Last edited:
Soldato
100% crops please, anyone???
Soldato
no lol i'm implying i've tried it at 1920x1080 and while yes it gives good performance it just looks to fuzzy to be considered by me, i'd sooner run 2xAA than this offal.
will try it again in the coming months and see if it gets improved
Soldato
Nah, it's not that blurry. I doubt you'd notice the difference during gameplay and all types of AA tend to blur the image slightly anyway. I can't tell the difference between the MSAA and MLAA screenshots of the unigine bench.
I don't have a problem with a little blurring, it makes what are essentially sharp and pixelated images and gives a more realistic feel. That's as long as it doesn't go too for of course. I'll have to give it a try and see.
I don't have a problem with a little blurring, it makes what are essentially sharp and pixelated images and gives a more realistic feel. That's as long as it doesn't go too for of course. I'll have to give it a try and see.
Last edited:
Associate
Soldato
Some people can't try it for themselves..
unfortunately.
Soldato
The StarCraft look good to.
Associate
Soldato
Can imageshack hold 2560x1600.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2010
- Posts
- 611
I've never known them to have a resolution limit, so yes.
Soldato
Damn it! I was hoping i had an excuse.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2010
- Posts
- 611
Haha well, maybe you can just say images at that resolution are just obscene, bordering pornographic - which Imageshack definitely don't allow
Soldato
Haha well, maybe you can just say images at that resolution are just obscene, bordering pornographic - which Imageshack definitely don't allow
Soldato
Having played around with this a bit, it definitely has its place, but equally it's not a magic bullet.
The good news is that since it is entirely post-processing, it will work on absolutely anything, which is great for some of those games that don't have inbuilt AA, or require a high level of black magic to get it working reliably on some cards. I've found it particularly nice on some RTS games, and also ingame on FPS's, where it is more the absence of jaggies that matters, as opposed to exactly how smooth they are.
The downside is that as a post-processing filter, it is applied like you would expect a photographic filter to be applied, instead of utilising the code knowledge about a scene's structure. You therefore get AA applied to EVERYTHING. The most noticeable side effect of this is that all menu text is noticeably softened - I would expect this to be a problem in games such as Fallout 3, where text is frequent and important. You're also going to lose some texture detail, although I have to say that this hasn't struck me in the few minutes I have experimented with this effect.
Hopefully those two paragraphs will be of use to some people out there, but I'll end with a question - has anyone been able to discern any difference between the Box/Narrow Tent/Wide Tent/Edge Detect filter options? I can't say I can see a blind bit of difference personally!
The good news is that since it is entirely post-processing, it will work on absolutely anything, which is great for some of those games that don't have inbuilt AA, or require a high level of black magic to get it working reliably on some cards. I've found it particularly nice on some RTS games, and also ingame on FPS's, where it is more the absence of jaggies that matters, as opposed to exactly how smooth they are.
The downside is that as a post-processing filter, it is applied like you would expect a photographic filter to be applied, instead of utilising the code knowledge about a scene's structure. You therefore get AA applied to EVERYTHING. The most noticeable side effect of this is that all menu text is noticeably softened - I would expect this to be a problem in games such as Fallout 3, where text is frequent and important. You're also going to lose some texture detail, although I have to say that this hasn't struck me in the few minutes I have experimented with this effect.
Hopefully those two paragraphs will be of use to some people out there, but I'll end with a question - has anyone been able to discern any difference between the Box/Narrow Tent/Wide Tent/Edge Detect filter options? I can't say I can see a blind bit of difference personally!
Soldato
Personally all it needs is sharpening and it will look perfectly in focus and tack sharp.
It should also be easy for AMD to do, as it's post processing, and it might only cost an additional 1 FPS.
What AMD could do, is allow folks to customise how much sharpening they want to see etc.
Additionally they could allow some PP effects akin to how I would PP a photo in Lightroom, and that... would be awesome.
If they can do the above then it becomes the magic bullet.