Don't think you're one of the few. It's widely named as one of the most overrated films.
I must admit I loved it at the cinema but that was just because it was the first real 3D film and it was a great experience. It wasn't a good film and I've hardly been waiting 8 years to see the 8 planned sequels that will delve into the back story of the....blue people and the generic human military.
My most striking memory of the first movie is when the great tree comes down and all the embers are floating around, in 3D at the cinema it looked utterly fantastic.
I'd say you've nailed exactly why I enjoyed my initial viewing so much at the cinema, I felt immersed within and as you say, everything felt like you could reach out and touch it.I watched the original in 3D and for me it was the first time I'd seen 3D done correctly. I mean there were the odd elements of the effect coming out of the screen but for the most part the world looked like it had proper depth, that you could actually get up out of your seat and go walk in the scene.
I'm looking forward to this immensely but I'm worried it won't be that great. It's setting itself up to be a victim of its own hype.
I'd say you've nailed exactly why I enjoyed my initial viewing so much at the cinema, I felt immersed within and as you say, everything felt like you could reach out and touch it.
Only other 3D experience that was as good was Dredd but that was also due to an excellent soundtrack and the slo-mo drug effects. I haven't seen anything that matched it and i've seen most 3D offerings of note at the cinema.
Your not alone. I have a special hatred of Avatar, I appreciate subjectiveness but I think, how much the first one is liked makes me hate it even more. Its terrible.I must be one of the few people not excited at all, I thought the first was terribly overrated. It will make a good demo disc though I guess.
I watched the original in 3D and for me it was the first time I'd seen 3D done correctly. I mean there were the odd elements of the effect coming out of the screen but for the most part the world looked like it had proper depth, that you could actually get up out of your seat and go walk in the scene.
I watched the original in 3D and for me it was the first time I'd seen 3D done correctly. I mean there were the odd elements of the effect coming out of the screen but for the most part the world looked like it had proper depth, that you could actually get up out of your seat and go walk in the scene.
I enjoyed the first one, probably more because it was a visual masterpiece. I think I need to convince the mrs we need a double date night to watch them both.
Not sure if already mentioned but being reported today this needs to return $2 billion to make a profit
James Cameron himself is worried that it will not have the same impact and success as the first. So he is under pressure and was taking apart the first movie to identify and use the same traits to the sequel.