Just want to say I've had monitor since Xmas day now and think it's a massive improvement over my previous one. I am not some anal stickler for the best of everything, in fact I've only been gaming at 1280*1024 and without AA for the past 5 years. Despite this I usually spend a fair bit on upgrades so I'm not scraping the barrel and struggling to meet min specs. This time I pushed the boat a little further out, opting for the benq and a gtx 570 to boot, and I am very impressed by the performance on offer. 3d is a valuable insight into the future of gaming and offers similar upgrade to the first voodoo3d cards back in the day.
As then, the support and process are not fully mature, but however this tech progresses I feel happy to have joined at this stage (whether you count 3d efforts to date or not).
As for the benq itself, the out of box settings are very garish but can be drawn back according to the various explanations on the net. I am currently away from the pc but when I return I will be sure to try the default settings with 3d (took a while to sort drivers) to see if this is a solution to the inevitable darkening of image behind the glasses.
Besides the darkening ( which I for one find very bearable), the other oft cried issue is that of ghosting. This is at times evident and uniform, but I have either managed it by changing depth, convergence and refresh rate or by simply getting used to it. None of these are deal breakers to me: a user as described above.
The most noticeable difference to me is owing to 120hz refresh rate. This really is a treat for someone like me who has confined themself to 60hz for the past 8 or so years.
I hope this is of some help to those less dependent on raw numbers and data when considering a purchase. The more people that adopt this tech the greater its potential.
Overall a highly positive experience thus far. If you can afford it and are genuinely interested by exciting tech, then the benq is not a bad choice.